Answer:
At first the speaker is jubilant, catching a tremendous fish, landing a whopper, but as the poem moves on this pride is tempered by closer and closer observation of the specimen.
All kinds of associations come to light through multiple uses of simile. This fish has a complex anatomy, reflected by the speaker's use of the figurative language of awe.
Awe turns to admiration and the acknowledgement that this is no ordinary fish, it has the scars of battle to prove its worth. Surely such a prize fish deserves another chance? The poem ends in a revelatory fashion as the rainbow takes over, which tips the balance.
(I hope this helps ♡^▽^♡)
if you need the analysis here is a link of the website i got the answer from: https://owlcation.com/humanities/Analysis-of-Poem-The-Fish-by-Elizabeth-Bishop
Depends on the type of material. If the material is meant to be emotional and based on opinions then yes definitely but if the material is historical or strictly from a central point then no the reader should try to be unbiased from its point of view.
Answer:
Bradstreet believed that God has punished her through her sicknesses and her domestic problems.
Explanation:
This because that the Puritans believed that suffering was God’s way of preparing the heart for accepting his grace.
Answer:
I believe C would be the correct answer.
Explanation:
D is very easily excluded, the URL path doesn't matter.
A is excluded because the name of your blog doesn't tell you how to present your information to your audience.
B is excluded because I believe bloggers are speaking on their opinions, they're not worried about mainstream media, they're presenting info geared towards their audience.
Answer:
She said that she had been smoking too much.
She told me not to come with me.