(A) Debt ratio = 0.32
Debt/(debt + equity)= 0.32
Debt = 0.32 *Debt + 0.32 *Equity
0.68* Debt = 0.32* Equity
Debt = 0.32*Equity/0.68 = 0.32/0.68 * Equity
Debt /equity ratio = (0.32/068*Equity)/Equity
Debt/Equity ratio = 0.32/0.68 = 0.47
Debt-equity ratio = 0.47 (Rounded to 2 decimals)
(B) Equity multiplier = 1 + debt -equity = 1+0.47 = 1.47
Equity multiplier = 1.47 (Rounded to 2 decimals)
Answer: Yes
Explanation: In the above case, a quasi-contract was formed. This is when a bilateral contract is not in place but one party will enjoy the benefit of the activities of the other party and may be enriched by it.
A bilateral agreement is the exchange of a promise for another and in this case would have been, the promise that Dozier would pay for Paschall’s work. This was not established, however, Dozier will benefit from Paschall’s work unduly if he does not pay for the improvements. The law holds that he has to pay for Paschall’s work to prevent being unjustly enriched.
I believe it would be C.) multiple installations of gas, water, and electric lines
With respect to binding Frakking Mining to contracts, Emery is: B. an agent and has the authority.
<h3>What is contract?</h3>
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties in which the parties involve tend to agreed to the terms and condition of the contract.
Hence, if Emery serves in a representative capacity for Frakking's Mining Corporation owners with regards to binding Frakking Mining to contracts, Emery is will be an agent and tend to have the authority.
Therefore the correct option is B.
Learn more about contract here:brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
