Answer:
the current yield is 6.15%
Explanation:
Here for computing the current yield first we have to determine the monthly payment by applying the PMT formula
Given that
NPER = 5 × 2 = 10
RATE = 8% ÷ 2 = 4%
PV = $900
FV = $1,000
The formula is shown below:
= PMT(RATE;NPER;-PV;FV;TYPE)
After applying the above formula, the pmt is $27.67
Now the current yield is
= $27.67 × 2 ÷ $900
= 6.15%
Hence, the current yield is 6.15%
Answer:
The correct answer is A.Sales revenue will not be impacted because the company has already accrued for estimated refunds and returns.
Explanation:
If a customer wishes to return or obtain a refund of any product or service that you have sold and that you have been paid for, you must create and register a sales credit note that specifies the required change. To include the correct sales invoice information, you can create the sales credit note directly from the posted sales invoice or you can create a new sales credit note with copied invoice information.
If two identifiable markets differ with respect to their price elasticity of demand and resale is impossible, a firm with market power will set lower price in the market that is more price elastic.
Under price discrimination, a monopolist charges different prices in different sub-markets. Thus, a monopolist divides the market into sub-markets based on their price elasticity of demand.
So, if there are two identifiable markets, where the customer would want to buy from you, these markets will differ with respect to their price elasticity of demand and here resale is impossible.
Hence, a firm with market power will set lower price in the market that is more price elastic.
To learn more about price elasticity here:
brainly.com/question/13565779
#SPJ4
Answer:
The most reliable capital budgeting technique that should be used when comparing mutually exclusive alternative investments is net present value.
The correct answer is C
Explanation:
Net present value is the difference between present value of inflow and present value of outflow. NPV is superior to other investment appraisal techniques because of its value additivity. Whenever conflict arises between net present value and internal rate of return, the conflict is resolved in the favour of net present value.