Answer:
(A) True
Explanation:
Differential cost is the difference between the cost to produce Product O and produce Product P; in this case it’s the additional cost of $13 per pound to produce
So the statement “The differential cost of producing Product P is $13 per pound” is true
Since no choices are presented, I'll just list down the parts of a cover letter.
A cover letter is a one page document that is attached to a resume. It has 5 parts.
1) The Salutation : Dear Hiring Manager,
2) The Grab - Opening Paragraph - introduction about yourself and your immediate qualification on the position you are applying
3) The Hook - Second Paragraph - examples of work performed and its results
4) Paragraph of Knowledge - Third Paragraph - knowledge you have about the company and its needs in connection with your application.
5) The Close - Fourth Paragraph - quick summary of what you are offering and how they can contact you.
Answer:
In order to find the dividend 8 years from now we will use the formula D*(1+R)^N
Right now
D= 1.84
R=1.65%
N= 8
1.84*(1.0165)^8
=2.097
The dividend 8 years from now will be $2.097.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Often reveal products that were under- or over-costed by traditional costing systems.
Explanation:
Activity-Based Costing or ABC is a managerial accounting method that assigns certain indirect costs to the products incurring the bulk of those costs. ABC is primarily used in the manufacturing sector to make a better calculation of the true cost of production per unit. Compared to the traditional costing method, ABC spots products that could be under-costed or over-costed.
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
