Answer:
$30,000
Explanation:
A supplemental disclosure of cash flow information requires that all the cash paid in interest during the period must be disclosed.
In Ash's case:
beginning balance interest payable account $15,000
+ interest expense during the year $20,000
<u>- ending balance interest payable account ($5,000) </u>
supplemental disclosure = $30,000
Answer:
$2.50
Explanation:
Given that,
Dividend Paying out under a policy = 45% of its income
Net income = $1,250,000
Number of shares outstanding = 225,000
Total dividends:
= 45% of its income
= $ 1,250,000 × 45%
= $562,500
Dividend per share:
= Total dividends ÷ Number of shares outstanding
= $562,500 ÷ 225,000
= $2.50
The correct alternative is letter C. Inflation control. This is the first strategy to control the currency in the economy, being one of the main objectives of monetary policy in a country.
<h3 /><h3>What is monetary policy?</h3>
It is the set of governmental strategies and actions to interfere in the investment market and in the consumption power of citizens, through the control of the basic interest rate of the economy, which is an instrument capable of influencing the value of a currency and the prices of goods. consumption, thus generating a control over inflation in search of economic balance in a country.
Therefore, controlling inflation is a short-term measure that generates a series of impacts on an economy, such as fiscal and monetary contraction measures, such as increasing taxes and reducing public spending.
Find out more about monetary police here:
brainly.com/question/13926715
#SPJ1
False lolllll I have to write more
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.