Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.
Explanation:
Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.
Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.
The most accurate conclusion that can be made about the correlational research study is "None of the above can be concluded."
<h3>What is a Research?</h3>
This refers to the systematic study that is done to establish facts and reach new conclusions.
Hence, we can see that The most accurate conclusion that can be made about the correlational research study is "None of the above can be concluded."
Read more about research here:
brainly.com/question/25257437
#SPJ1
Answer:
It brought electricity to rural areas; it contributed to the end of sharecropping; it helped modernize agriculture.
Explanation:
Georgia is one of the states that most benefited from Franklin D Roosevelt's New Deal because the President would summer in Warm Springs, Georgia. He knew some of the state's problems first hand. FDR implemented federal programs that paid farmers to stop producing cotton as a means to address the oversupply that was occurring and to raise the price. Roosevelt's intention was to help the tenant farmers and sharecroppers to become self-supporting small farmers and there were some local successes in that the New Deal was the first federal program that concretely helped rural residents to improve their farms and homesteads. Yet the small landowner was still outdone by the larger planters who took advantage of federal funds to mechanize their farms.
Negative reinforcement and positive reinforcement
