is the length both sides already or just on one side?
because if the 16ft. is only on one side, and the sum of the both sides are 32ft, i think the width of the rectangle must be 16ft, which means 8ft from the first side and 8ft from the second side.
but if the 16ft. is the sum of both sides, which means 8ft from the first length and 8ft from the second length, then the answer for the width is 16ft, for each side of the width. 16 for the first width, and 16 for the second width.
is my explanation too complicated?? sorry hehe.
Answer:
x ≤ 2
Step-by-step explanation:
-6x - 7 ≥ -19
Add 7 to both sides: -6x ≥ -12
Divide both sides by 6: -x ≥ -2
Divide both sides by -1: x ≤ 2
When you divide by a negative, you have to switch the sign around (hence why I chose to do this in separate steps, so it's clearer)
Answer: See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Amount earned by movie = $3,000,000.
Percentage that went to movie = 60%
Percentage that went to theater = 40%
Revenue gotten by movie studio = 60% × $3,000,000
= 0.6 × $3,000,000
= $1,800,000
Revenue gotten by theaters = 40% × $3,000,000
= 0.4 × $3,000,000
= $1,200,000
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello,
<em>"Ray says the third-degree polynomial has four intercepts. Kelsey argues the function can have as many as three zeros only."</em>
We know that Kelsey is right, a polynomial of degree 3 has maximum 3 zeroes, so it means that the graph of this polynomial has maximum 3 x-intercepts.
<u>So how Ray can be right too?</u>
we need to think of y-intercept, if we add the y-intercept then Ray can be right too,
as you can see in one example below
there are 3 x-intercepts and 1 y-intercept.
This being said, Ray is not always right. For instance 
has only 1 zero (multiplicity 3) its graph has only 1 intercept in the point (0,0)
hope this helps
