Answer: Social psychologists would call this confusion a cosequence of pluralistic ignorance
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance is a situation in which most members of a group privately reject a rule, but go along with it since they incorrectly assume that most others accept it. This is also described as "no one believes, but everyone thinks that everyone believes". In a nutshell, pluralistic ignorance is a bias about a social group, supported by the members of that social group.
This could have a variety of impacts that this situation could have on the local market. Firstly, the introduction of a Chinese company would mean that there would more competition for the American solar power company which would then have to contend with the Chinese company for sales. They would then be in a race to bring the most affordable options to the consumers as well as new advances in the technology or greater service. This would mean that the consumers would benefit greatly from this situation as they would be getting better products and service for an affordable cost.
Also, both companies could have a working arrangement where they act as an oligopoly and dominate the solar power industry in that particular market. Although, more companies brings more competition, when there aren't a multiplicity of competitors, there is always the danger that the few businesses will band together and operate as one entity where they set specific prices, standards of service and technological advances introduced. They would only superficially be competing with each other. In this arrangement, the consumers would endure the same standard as having one entity dominating the market.
Another scenario would be where the American solar power company makes a superior product and as such would promote their products to the market as 'higher end' which would ensure they have a core and stable consumer base.
The correct answer is this - <span>this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting.
If the conditions were a little bit different, then his IRB review would also require different results. However, since there is no real interaction with the children, but rather only observation, an IRB review is not necessary in this case and can be avoided.
</span>
Answer:
D)They believed that Lincoln would press for the abolition of slavery.
Answer:
"Facial-feedback hypothesis"
Explanation:
In psychology, the idea behind the facial-feedback hypothesis is that the facial expressions we make directly influence our emotional experiences.
The question mentions that Kathyrn seemed to enjoy the show more once she was prompted by her mom to smile while watching it. This would be a prime example of this theory. I hope this helped!
