1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SVETLANKA909090 [29]
3 years ago
7

Why will the people respond favorably to a change in leadership?

History
1 answer:
timofeeve [1]3 years ago
7 0
The people would respond favorable to a change in leadership if the current government fails to do what they said they would do (the positive things at least), fail to even do the minimum, or the people just don't like the current leader for one reason or another

hope this helps

You might be interested in
What colony was New Hampshire established as in 1679
Ray Of Light [21]
Royal province was the colony in New Hampshire
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best supports the idea that significant anger over racism existed in the US during the 1960s?
Schach [20]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

bc there were a lot of protest

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Section 1
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

1. eleven

2. Missouri

3. Henry Clay  

4. maine

5. Missouri Compromise

6. California

7. Texas

8. Wilmot Proviso

9. Mexico

10. John C. Calhoun

11. slavery

12. Free-soil

Explanation:

In 1819, Congressman James Tallmadge, Jr., of New York initiated an uproar in the South when he proposed two amendments to an account admitting Missouri to the Union as a free state. The first banned slaves from moving to Missouri, and the second would free all Missouri slaves born after admission to the Union at the age of 25. With the admission of Alabama as a slave state in 1819, the United States was equally divided with 11 slave states and 11 free states. The admission of the new state of Missouri as a slave state would give the slave a majority in the Senate; the Tallmadge Amendment would give the free states a majority.

The Tallmadge amendments passed the House of Representatives, but failed in the Senate when five Northern Senators voted with all the southern senators. The question was now the admission of Missouri as a slave state, and many leaders shared Thomas Jefferson's fear of a crisis over slavery - a fear that Jefferson described as "a fire bell at night." The crisis was solved by the 1820 Commitment, which admitted Maine to the Union as a free state at the same time that Missouri was admitted as a slave state. The Commitment also prohibited slavery in the Louisiana Purchase territory north and west of the state of Missouri along the 36–30 line. The Missouri Commitment calmed the issue until its limitations of slavery were repealed by the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854.

In the South, the Missouri crisis aroused old fears again that a strong federal government could be a fatal threat to slavery. The Jeffersonian coalition that united southern planters and northern farmers, mechanics and artisans in opposition to the threat posed by the Federalist Party had begun to dissolve after the war of 1812. Only in the Missouri crisis did the Americans realize of the political possibilities of a sectional attack against slavery, and only in the mass policy of the Jackson Administration this type of organization around this issue became practical.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the journey of Marco polo bridge the cultural differences between east and west ?
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Crossing the Silk Road, Marco Polo brought elements of Western culture to the East and Eastern culture back to the West.

Because of his exploration for trade of what is today modern China, Indonesia, Mongolia, Sri Lanka, and India, the east experienced Western culture.

Furthermore, his journeys were documented in the Book of the Marvels of the World which presented to Europeans the Asian cities and countries.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which side will the Indians take and why
Alla [95]

Answer:

For many Indians, in particular, the Shawnee, Creeks and the very large and powerful Cherokee and Iroquois, the British seemed like a better bet. The British knew full well that the Indians wanted to stem the tide of settlement, and they promised the Indians that if they won, the settlers would be stopped.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which region was home to the sioux
    11·2 answers
  • Ashoka was most notable for
    15·1 answer
  • What are three examples of romes legacy in architecture
    12·1 answer
  • Please help!!! urgent
    15·1 answer
  • Which best describes the gettysburg battle on july 1, 1863
    7·1 answer
  • Did president truman make the right decision to use the atomic bombs
    6·2 answers
  • What are some things Thomas Jefferson did to encourage farming? He gave land to settlers in exchange for harvested crops. He cut
    8·2 answers
  • AP WORLD: What geographic regions did Portugal, Spain, England, The Netherlands, and France control from 1450-1750?
    11·1 answer
  • Who took one of the biggest L in history?
    9·2 answers
  • In your opinion, was the Women's Rights Movement a success? Essay
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!