Answer:
b) product differentiation
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the competitive strategy that Hueblue software is implementing is known as product differentiation. This strategy focuses on making sure that the product that a particular company offers is unique and different from it competitor's products in order to make it more desired by a particular target market. Which is what Hueblue is doing by developing motion-control-enabled games which it's competitors do not have.
Answer:
$3.344,67
Explanation:
Investment A( Simple interest) = Cf= Ci x(1+(ixn)) = $10.000 x(1+0,0775*10)=
$17.750
Investment B (Compound interest)= Cf= Ci x(1+i)^n = $10.000 (1+0,0775)^10=
$ 21.094,67
A - B = $17.750 - 21.094,67 = - $3.344,67
Amortizing a loan P over n periods at i% interest / period, the payment per period is given by:
In given situation,
P=20000
period=month
i=10%/12
n=5*12=60 months
A. monthly payment amount
to the nearest cent
B. EAR (effective annual rate)
the APR is 10%, but compounded monthly.
So
EAR=(1+i/12)^12-1
=(1+0.1/12)^12-1
=0.104713
=10.4713% (effective annual rate)
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
$300
Explanation:
Given:
Society A
Society B
Society A will pay $140 per unit
Society B will pay $160 per unit
Commonly pay $140 for two units produced.
Computation:
Society will pay total amount for the public goods = $160 + $140
Society will pay the total amount for the public goods = $300
Therefore, $300 Is the total amount paid by society.
