The answer is A. because it is a crime against the law.
The answer is encoding strategies. These are individuals' individualized way of ordering data they get from outer stimuli. Cognitive affective units incorporate every one of those mental, social, and physiological parts of individuals that allow them to cooperate with their condition with some soundness in their conduct.
This suggests that the number was only briefly stored in her procedural memory.
<h3>Procedural memory</h3>
Procedural memory, also known as implicit memory, is a category of long-term memory used to carry out various tasks and abilities. It is essentially the recollection of how to carry out specific tasks. Examples of procedural memory are riding a bike, tying your shoes, and making an omelet without a recipe. Very early in infancy, as you start to learn how to walk, talk, eat, and play, procedural memories start to develop. These recollections become so deeply embedded that they nearly come naturally. These motor abilities are ones that you can accomplish without much, if any, conscious thought; you just do them.
Learn more about procedural memory here:
brainly.com/question/5646002
#SPJ4
Answer:
For many centuries, natural law was recognized as a type of higher law that spelled out universal truths for the moral ordering of society based on a rational understanding of human nature. As a higher moral law, it gave citizens a standard for determining if the written laws and customs of their nation or any other nation were just or unjust, right or wrong, humane or inhumane. Today, natural law is not discussed very much, at least not explicitly. When mentioned at all, it is usually rejected as dangerous because it undermines existing laws or as intolerant because it is contrary to “multiculturalism,” which requires the non-judgmental acceptance of other cultures.
This negative view of natural law can be traced to Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), whose writings are largely devoted to showing the anarchy and civil wars caused by appeals to natural and divine laws above the will of the sovereign. Hobbes rejected traditional higher law doctrines and encouraged people to accept the established laws and customs of their nations, even if they seemed oppressive, for the sake of civil peace and security. His critique has been a leading cause of the demise of natural law and the acceptance of positive law as the only reliable guide for political authority.
One may be equally surprised to learn, however, that many people today embrace a different (and seemingly contradictory) view of natural law, and this too is traceable to Thomas Hobbes. For example, when conscientious people are confronted with violations of human rights—as in religious theocracies that violate women’s rights or in countries that allow sweatshops to trample on worker’s rights—they feel compelled to protest the injustice of those practices and to change them for the better. The protesters usually deny that they are following natural law, but they obviously are asserting a belief in universal moral truths that are grounded in human nature—in this case, the natural equality of human beings that underlies human rights. This understanding of higher law originates with Hobbes because he was largely responsible for transforming classical natural law into modern natural rights, thereby beginning the “human rights revolution” in thinking on natural law. How is it possible for Hobbes and his followers to embrace seemingly contradictory views of natural law, rejecting one form as intolerant, self-righteous, and anarchical, while embracing another form as the universal ideal of social justice? Let us turn to Hobbes for an answer to this puzzle, and, in so doing, uncover the sources of our modern conceptions of law, rights, and justice.
Answer: eco- nomic impact on affected businesses by and the costs of compliance, if any, with a rule for businesses, including but not limited to the costs of equipment, supplies, labor and administration.
Explanation:
