Answer:
A) QE = 400, PE = 250
QW = 325, PW = 375
b) east market has more elastic market demand
Explanation:
Given data :
Marginal cost = $50 ( both markets )
demand and marginal revenue in each market are given differently
a) Determine/find the profit-maximizing price and quantity in each market
For east market :
50 = 450 - QE
hence QE = 450 -50 = 400
since QE = 400 ( quantity for east market )
400 = 900 - 2PE
PE = 250 ( PROFIT maximizing price for east market )
For west market
50 = 700 - 2QW
Hence QW = 325
since QW = 325
325 = 700 - pw
PW = 375
B) The market in which demand is more elastic is the east market because the quantity demanded is higher and also the profit maximizing price is lower as well
Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
Answer:
review your progress, reevaluate, and revise your plan
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the step that you have completely neglected is to review your progress, reevaluate, and revise your plan. That is because in this scenario many events have occurred, and it seems that your financial plan after retirement has not been adjusted with each and every one of these life events. Therefore it is outdated and most likely not providing the benefits it once did.
That should be false because it says never and the person is student
Capital structure increases the ability of the company to find new wealth- creating investment opportunities.