Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Answer(1):</u>
Law of Cosines.
<u>Answer(2):</u>
since side "c" is missing so we will write formula used for side "c"
<u>Answer(3):</u>
First lets write both sine and cosine formulas:
Check the attached picture for the list of formulas:
From given picture we see that two angles A and B are missing. Also 1 side "c" is missing.
Sine formula uses two angles while cosine formula uses only one angles.
Hence cosine formula will be best choice to find the missing values.
Answer:
1) z = -6.32
2) p-value = 0.001 × 10^(-2)
3) we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice currently serving on the Supreme Court
Step-by-step explanation:
We are told that In a representative sample of 1000 adult Americans, only 400 could name at least one justice.
Thus:
Sample proportion; p^ = 400/1000 = 0.4
Sample size: n = 1000
We want to find if there is convincing evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice.
Thus, the hypothesis is defined as;
Null hypothesis:H0: p ≥ 0.5
Alternative hypothesis: Ha < 0.5
Formula for the test statistic is;
z = (p^ - p)/√(p(1 - p)/n)
Plugging in the relevant values;
z = (0.4 - 0.5)/√(0.5(1 - 0.5)/1000)
z = -6.32
From online p-value from z-score calculator attached, using z = -6.32; significance level of 0.01; one tailed hypothesis;
We have:
p-value = 0.00001 = 0.001 × 10^(-2)
The p-value is less than the significance level and so we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice currently serving on the Supreme Court
