Answer:
50%
Step-by-step explanation:
if you look below girls (in total) bought 100 pepsi colas and thats half of the total (200)
both (0,350) and (250,700) fall in the shaded are
and check:
350 *3 = 1050, which is more than 1000 and more than double the amount of hotdogs ( 0)
700 *3 = 2100, so over 1000 and more than double the amount of hotdogs(250*2=500)
so those 2 are correct
Answer:
$8.40
Step-by-step explanation:
8.6 plus 8.2 is 16.8 so they had a total of 16.8 ounces. $0.50 per ounce so you need to multiply 16.8 by 0.50 which is 8.40. you can also do 8.6(0.5) plus 8.2(0.5)= 4.3 plus 4.1 = 8.4
Answer:
- rational
- irrational
- irrational
- irrational
- √7, it is irrational
Step-by-step explanation:
A <em>rational</em> number is one that can be expressed as the ratio of two integers. All fractions that have integer numerators and (non-zero) denominators are <em>rational</em> numbers. Any finite decimal number, or any repeating decimal number, is a rational number. These can always be expressed as the ratio of two integers. For example, 0.4040... = 40/99, and 0.286 = 286/1000.
To make an irrational sum, at least one of the contributors must be irrational. You want an irrational 2-number sum that has 7/8 as one of the contributors. Since 7/8 is rational, the other contributor must be irrational.
__
<u>Step 1</u>. The number 7/8 is <em>rational</em>.
<u>Step 2</u>. The desired sum is <em>irrational</em>.
<u>Step 3</u>. The rule <em>rational + </em><em>irrational</em><em> = irrational</em> applies.
<u>Step 4</u>. An <em>irrational</em> number must be chosen.
Step 5. √7 will produce an irrational sum, because <em>it is irrational</em>.
Two supplementary angles when added together need to equal 180 degrees.
Let the first angle = X
The second angle would then be X - 152
Add them together to equal 180:
X + X - 152 = 180
Simplify:
2X -152 = 180
Add 152 to each side:
2X = 332
Divide both sides by 2:
X = 332 / 2
X = 166
The first angle = X = 166 degrees.
The second angle = X - 152 = 166 - 152 = 14 degrees.
The angles are 166 and 14
