The answer is $100.
Amount she steals= $100
Amount she bought goods= $70
Amount the owner returns as change = $30
Amount owner loses=?
Amount she steals +amount of goods - amount she gives to owner + amount owner returns as change = $100 + $70 - $100 + $30 = $200 - $100 = $100
Answer:A, Your personal information may be used in ways you do not want
Explanation:
If it is a unsafe site than there for your personal information can go places you do not want them to.
If we preempt a resource from a process, the process cannot continue with its normal execution and it must be rolled back
.
Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The avoidance of energy is a tool used to crack a computer network impasse. In other terms, an operating system uses a method to break down a condition whereby each capital is used on a number of systems, each hoping for more resources.
There is an impasse when 2 or more clients wait for information to be secured, which blocks all sessions. Through rolling back the declaration associated with the contract, Oracle identifies and removes blocks automatically.
Prevents impediments by controlling how the program can seek services and how they are treated (system architecture). The goal is to allow at least one of the requirements needed for impasse can never be reached.
Answer:
Correct option is (C)
Explanation:
Given:
Mortgage amount (PV) = $650,000
APR = 10%
Per month interest rate (rate) = 10% ÷ 12 = 0.8333% or 0.008333
Mortgage period (nper) = 30 years or 30×12 = 360 months
Monthly payment can be calculated using spreadsheet function =pmt(rate,nper,PV)
Monthly payment is computed as $5,704.02
PMT is negative as it is a cash outflow.
While perhaps unethical is has no implementation on business.
1. Many companies use these poor human rights to maximise their profits and product stuff way cheaper than they could in the US.
2. Trade is ALWAYS good. We can benefit from trading with countries. For example, the US is well known for their production of corn, but they can't produce much rice. If we wanted rice in our diet, we wouldn't be able to eat it without trading with China. While the US could probably make rice, it would be WAY more expensive to make.
3. In the 21st century, customers are getting more involved in whether a company is "ethical" or not. They'd abstain from products that they don't like the ethics of. E.g. if you are against the killing of animals, you won't buy animal products. Likewise if you are against child labor, you might not buy products from certain countries/companies with bad reputations.