Answer: Insufficient external justification; more dissonance
Explanation:
insufficient justification effect:
Describes that in some cases people will go against their own person belief in order to partake in a particular action of behaviour because there is a promise of a small reward versus large reward but reject an activity if it associated with a mild threat versus a sever threat.
Insufficient external justification occurs when a person doesn't have enough justification why they couldn't do something they desired to do.
Cognitive dissonance defines the conflict that exist within someone as they struggle with whether to get involved with the behaviour that goes against their beliefs or attitudes and they may mentally try to adjust their attitudes, behaviour or beliefs in order to establish balance.
Answer:
"Learning" will be the correct solution.
Explanation:
- The learning process would be based on statistically measurable behavioral changes. Behavior theories clearly describe learning as that of the development of a lifelong routine or behavioral improvement.
- The hypothesis would be that learning occurs whenever a context guide or stimuli is introduced as well as the instructor responds to the stimuli with a certain sort of reaction. Strengthening as well as punishing is a central tenet of learning philosophies.
The purpose was for Hammurabi (sometimes written "Hammurapi") to set down a reasonable and unchanging set of laws that addressed common problems in his kingdom. The code was especially important because, up until that time in history, there really were not any wide-spread laws that unified such a large group of people.
Before this, justice in many places would have been in the vigilante style, i.e. if someone in your small village steals your cow, it's most likely up to you and your family to go find it and then punish the perpetrator. The punishment for stealing might have been being lashed with a whip, for example, in one town and yet five miles away in another town the punishment was having a hand cut off. Under the code, everyone was eligible for the same punishments and fines no matter where they went. With one law from the king on down, there was less risk of being hanged or stoned for something relatively minor, or starting a never-ending feud between families over a disputed punishment
