Answer:
cross-sectional study
Explanation:
Dr. Milano compares the performance of a group of 20-year-olds, a group of 45-year-olds, and a group of 70-year-olds on several tests of fluid intelligence and several tests of crystallized intelligence. Dr. Milano's investigation BEST exemplifies a <u>cross-sectional study</u>. A cross-sectional study is a type of observational study that analyzes data from a population, or a representative subset, at a specific point in time, it involves the use of different set of people who differ in the trait of interest. For example, the effect of age on intelligence level will involve the selection of subjects across the cross-section of ages of interest.
Answer:
- Establishing government-run employment agencies to connect unemployed workers to job vacancies.
- Offering recipients of unemployment insurance benefits a cash bonus if they find a new job within a specified number of weeks
Explanation:
<u>Establishing government-run employment agencies to connect unemployed workers to job vacancies</u> helps as the government acting as middlemen between enterprises looking to hire workers and unemployed looking for jobs satisfies a need they both have. <u>Offering recipients of unemployment insurance benefits a cash bonus if they find a new job</u> within a specified number of weeks might encourage the unemployed to invest more time looking for a new job in order to collect the bonus.
On the other hand, <u>extending the number of weeks for which unemployed workers are eligible for unemployment insurance benefits from the government</u> might discourage many recipients of these benefits from actively searching for a new job, as they can consider the unemployment benefits might be a better alternative.
Answer:
poverty- lack of education, lack of law enforcement
lack of freedom of speech
lack of right civil society
Explanation:
please mark me as a brainliest
the answer should be: The study's construct validity
A study's construct validity refers to the degree to which the experiments made in the study actually measures what it intended to measure. This can be seen on the study's standard of measurement and the correlation between variables used in the measurement and the actual phenomenon.
After hearing the claimed made by the teacher, Clarissa's immediately question whether the act of bullying can be measured.
She brought up an important point. The teacher never really specify what act considered as 'bullying'. Depending on people's perception, some consider a slight discomfort from social interaction might be considered as bullying, while other people might have the threshold. Because of this, she can say that the study's construct validity is questionable.
