Answer:
Rome
Explanation:
The American government is a government that has been formed on the principles of two religions and two ancient governments. The Judaism and the Christianity gave the primary principles for the formation of the American government, while the rest of the principles mostly came from the governments of ancient Greece (mostly Athens) and Rome. The combination of several different principles led to the extraction and combination of the best things of all four, thus creating a very good and rightful government. One of the very important traits of the American government is the bicameral system, something originating from ancient times, just adjusted for modern times, and this is a system that doesn't allow one political party to gain to much power and abuse it, thus protecting the interest of the people.
Answer:
Congress was unable to regulate interstate and foreign commerce; some states refused to pay for goods they purchased from abroad. Congress was unable to impose taxes; it could only borrow money on credit. No national court system was established to protect the rights of U.S. citizens.
Explanation:
Answer:
Aversive conditioning
Explanation:
Aversion conditioning is the conditioning process that is used to avoid undesired behavior. The stimuli are associated with the noxious stimulus or undesired stimulus to avoid undesired behavior or response. This is a therapy that is used to reduce the behavior that is undesirable for all.
Thus Paul gets an injection to avoid excessive smoking. This injection is given because Paul can avoid that undesirable behavior that is not accepted in the society.
This conditioning is useful in another disorder such as OCD.
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.