1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vivado [14]
3 years ago
14

What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?

History
1 answer:
skad [1K]3 years ago
7 0

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

You might be interested in
Answer the following question using the RACE Writing Strategy:
Margarita [4]

Answer:

Hedy and Irena were two women who faced the cruelty of the Nazis in different ways and even in the midst of the danger that this imposed on their lives, they continued to face. By reading about the two women, we can see how brave they were and how their will and justice have made a difference in the lives of many people and continue to be influential and an example for many today. While Hedy resisted the cruelty of the abuses imposed by the Nazis in the concentration camps; Irena helped Jewish children to survive and to reunite with their families when the fight ended. It is possible to know about the two in several articles and interviews spread over the most diverse sources and documents.

Explanation:

RACE is a style of writing that helps an author to create a well-structured and well-grounded argument, which allows a presentation of a topic in a pleasant and efficient way. Within this style, the word RACE appears as an acronym where the letters signify an element of the text structure. These elements are: A: Restate the question. A: Answer the question completely. C: Cite evidence from the text.

6 0
2 years ago
The original owners of war bonds sold their bonds to___
liberstina [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

War bonds are debt sold by the government to fund military operations. Over 85 million Americans bought war bonds during World War II. What Is a War Bond?

A war bond is a debt security issued by a government to finance military operations during times of war or conflict. Because war bonds offered a rate of return below the market rate, investment was achieved by making emotional appeals to patriotic citizens to lend the government money.

3 0
3 years ago
What is likely to happen if a nondemocratic government responds to internal unrest with the use of force by the military or by p
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:C

Explanation: Because if a nondemocratic gets hold of the government and there is unrest people protesting they will must likely respond with force. Then that will make the people madder at the government they were already mad and instead of the government to talk it out and try to fix the problem they will attack that will only make the people madder. They will feel as if they cant trust the government and if there is no trust that is really bad there becomes even more chaos.

8 0
1 year ago
Read the excerpt from Robert Yates’s notes from the Constitutional Convention on June 11, 1787. Mr. Wilson was of opinion, and t
beks73 [17]

Answer:

The Three-Fifths Compromise established that a state’s enslaved population would be counted for partial representation.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement made between delegates during the Constitutional Convention (1787) that established that the number of seats in the House of Representatives for each state should be calculated in accordance to the number of free persons (excluding Indians not taxed) and the three-fifths of slaves in every state. In other words, the Compromise counted three out of every five slaves as people for partial representation. This agreement would increase the power of slave states.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Germany first initiated the first invasion to kick off ww1 what nation was invaded
beks73 [17]
Germany invaded the neutral Belgium
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened when the stock market crashed in October of 1929?
    14·2 answers
  • Describe the role women played in World War 1.
    9·1 answer
  • How does culture spread from one place to another give an example of each of three types of cultural diffusion explain your answ
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a factor that contributed to the formation of the Farmers' Alliance?
    11·2 answers
  • I NEED HELP ASAPPPPP!!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Why where labor organizations blamed for the violence in Haymarket Square?
    13·1 answer
  • How long did it take for the potato to get from London to the South of france and from madrid to rome
    7·1 answer
  • Predict the impact that this division on Africa could have moving forward into World<br> War I?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the CONTINUITIES in America after the 14th amendment
    10·1 answer
  • What happens during a period of inflation?<br> Do not look for the answer from the web please.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!