1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vivado [14]
3 years ago
14

What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?

History
1 answer:
skad [1K]3 years ago
7 0

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

You might be interested in
What was reasons for the peloponnesian war?
Lerok [7]

The reason for the war was that the Sparta feared the growing power and influence of the Athenian Empire.

7 0
3 years ago
Which president asked Congress to grant the authority to bring court cases to desegregated schools?
NeX [460]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Mark as Brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
What did Sumerian use ziggurats for beside religious ceremonies?
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

yes.................

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the “Enlightenment” era
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

Enlightenment Era was the time period that ancient Greek and roman knowledge came into light once more and people began to deviate away from the religious perspective and went on to scientific and rational thinking.

Moreover, the rise of humanist philosophical backgrounds are another important element of this Era as well. Simply, this belief was that humans, their right and desires were more important than religious boundaries.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How was women’s productive work on the farm different than that of men? What provided the primary source of their farm income? r
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

women’s productive work on the farm different than that of men due to education, use of input at proper stage and dosage.

Explanation:

Women’s productive work on the farm different than that of men because of deficiency of information about the farming practices and less education about farming techniques and usage of fertilizers for the crop while the male has more knowledge about agriculture. Spring wheat was the primary source of their farm income according to the studies of north dakota.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were John Calvin’s followers in England and her American colonies called? A. Protestants B. Huguenots C. Presbyterians D. P
    8·2 answers
  • Why do political parties most often try to gerrymander voting districts
    5·2 answers
  • What event marked the beginning of the Islamic era ABCD
    7·1 answer
  • Compare the conditions for workers under the putting-out system with the working conditions in the factory system. Which system
    9·1 answer
  • Cuales son los objetivos de las Naciones Unidas según lo establecido en la carta
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the Civilian Conservation Corps one of the most popular New Deal programs in Georgia
    6·1 answer
  • While many nation-builders and citizens supported rights and the rule of law as a bedrock of their nations, expansion entailed t
    11·1 answer
  • Locke was a philosophe who supported the idea(s) of:
    11·1 answer
  • Explain what role the Mongols played during the period of 600 CE to 1450 CE in terms of building a vast land empire, and discuss
    15·1 answer
  • What is the correct answer to get brainlist?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!