1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena-s [515]
3 years ago
10

How do you say "im going to japan from may 22 to june 10" in japanese?

World Languages
1 answer:
Anettt [7]3 years ago
8 0
<span>" Watashi wa 22-nichi kara 6 tsuki 10-nichi ni Nihon ni iku" is the answer to this</span>
You might be interested in
The purpose of technology is to solve problems and meet needs. True False
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

Indeed, the main purpose of technology is to take our communication and our everyday functioning to another level. The last century's progress and modernization were inevitable. Technology growth is extremely fast and unstoppable. Like any kind of advance, the basic intention is always to develop humanity and perfect it.

Technology made global communication faster, easier, cheaper and more accessible. We are now able to talk to someone who is thousands of miles away or to see live broadcasts. Not to mention what did satellites, GPS or Google, for example.

More specific kind of technology meets high-level needs. Assistive technology helps people with disabilities function without much difficulty. There is no doubt technology made our lives easier.

However, when there is much use, there is also much abuse. Every day, we are victims of stealing, lying, offending, etc. on the internet. People found a way to misuse technology in order to achieve their goals. Think of hackers that can easily rob a bank, think of all fake profiles on social media or data theft. These are just basic examples of technology abuse, which ought to be controlled as much as possible.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
あなたは私の友人を詐欺しました笑笑ごめんなさい translated to english x3
Lady_Fox [76]

Answer:

im sorry you scammed my friend

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
3. the first amendment to the constitution prevents the government from interfering with the free exercise of religion. the litu
Dimas [21]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

The 1st Amendment states, quote:

<em> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...</em>

Now, this may be seen as the government not being able to interfere with banning the practice of human sacrifice. However, based on <em>Reynolds v. U.S. </em>(1878), The Supreme Court ruled that religious duty is not a defense against criminal indictment.

On top of that, human sacrifice in the modern world is deemed as a murder, as the victim is typically not consenting. If, however, they are, it may still be deemed as manslaughter. Under <em>Section 18 of the US Code 1111</em>, Murder is defined as, quote <em>the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought... or premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect death of any human being other than him who is killed</em>. (Section a, Section 18, U.S. Code 1111).

Within the religious liberties that are protected by federal law, it is stated under <em>Executive Order 13798 </em>(82 FR 21675 - Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty). The most important part to look at from this order is section 2, which states that <em>The free exercise of religion includes the right to act or abstain from action in accordance from one's religious beliefs</em>, and in section 10, which states that the given act <em>prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening any aspect of religious observance or practice, </em><em>unless imposition of that burden on a particular religious adherent satisfies strict scrutiny. </em> (Emphasis added, Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, RFRA 1993). In this case, the scrutiny is satisfied as the religious practice breaks US Code 1111 Section 18, as stated above. Therefore, <em>the government can be allowed to interfere with this particular practice. </em>

<u>Laws & rights in use in this case, as well as court decisions:</u>

- 1st Amendment, U.S. Constitution

- <em>Reynolds v. U.S. </em>(1878) - Chief Justice Morrison Waite.

- Section 18, US Code 1111

- Executive Order 13798

- Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, Religious Freedom Restoration act, 1993.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Learn more about Religious Freedom, here:

brainly.com/question/4773712 - Freedom of religious worship is guaranteed by...

<em />

3 0
2 years ago
Omu
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

Odpowiedź:

a)Biały rycerz uderza czarnego.

Czarny rycerz spada z konia.

b)Biały rycerz wykonuje czynność, a czarny jej podlega.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
My name is Mark, and I live in Madrid, Spain. My dad’s side of the family is French and Italian, while my mom’s side of the fami
zalisa [80]

Answer:

Both French ancestry

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements best accounts for the data shown in the graph above?
    12·2 answers
  • Dfeqrgegtagtqagr r grgq gd
    12·2 answers
  • Which strategy does the author use in the second paragrap to make the point that women are not free?
    15·2 answers
  • Perceptions are shared through communication.
    7·2 answers
  • What is a snow burst?
    11·2 answers
  • Con respecto a la literatura, seleccione la alter- nativa conceptualmente correcta.
    13·1 answer
  • 1.
    9·2 answers
  • Anyone know what this says???
    14·1 answer
  • Anyone who knows Irish...please answer!! <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdownarrow" id="TexFormula1" title="\downarrow" alt
    15·1 answer
  • What's the climax, exposition, falling action, and resolution in the story of Gumption by Langston Hughes?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!