Some researchers claim that more innocent individuals have been wrongly convicted due to inaccuracy of eyewitness testimony is common than all other causes combined.
- Eyewitness testimony is a word used in law. It alludes to a description provided by individuals about an occasion they were present for. For instance, they can be asked to describe a crime or a car accident they saw during a trial. This includes information about the crime scene, the offenders' identities, etc.
- Studies have indicated that roughly half of all wrongful convictions are caused by false eyewitness testimony. When Ohio State University researchers looked at hundreds of false convictions, they found that about 52 percent of the errors were due to inaccuracies made by eyewitnesses.
Learn more about Eyewitness testimony from here :brainly.com/question/26651069
#SPJ4
What is there to answer?(inside joke) lol
The answer is B! Magistrates
The United Kingdom does not have a codified constitution. However, a number of texts are considered to be constitutional, such that the "constitution of the United Kingdom" or "British constitution" may refer to a number of historical and momentous laws and principles that make up the country's body politic. Thus the term "UK constitution" is sometimes said to refer to an "unwritten" or uncodified constitution. The British constitution primarily draws from four sources: statute law (laws passed by the legislature), common law (laws established through court judgments), parliamentary conventions, and works of authority.[1] Similar to a constitutional document, it also concerns both the relationship between the individual and the state and the functioning of the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary.
Good Luck!
The factor that led to shifts in the supreme court decisions over time is that
- The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
<h3>
How the supreme court Justices became less liberal</h3>
The supreme court justices became less liberal due to the fact that a lot of these judges were conservatives.
The conservative judges were the ones that were in favor of keeping the ideals and the traditions that the country was built on.
<u>complete question:</u>
Which of the following factors most likely led to shifts in Supreme Court decision making over time?
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
After 1960, the Supreme Court deferred to the wishes of state and local governments rather than voting to expand the authority of the federal government.
Rather than pass new legislation, Congress was inclined to refer civil rights legislation to the Supreme Court.
Constitutional amendments enabled the Supreme Court to issue more liberal decisions.
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over
Read more on conservatives here:brainly.com/question/8668324
