1. Let
![s_n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_n)
be the number of seats in the
![n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n)
-th row. The number seats in the
![n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n)
-th row relative to the number of seats in the
![(n-1)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28n-1%29)
-th row is given by the recursive rule
![s_n=s_{n-1}+5](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_n%3Ds_%7Bn-1%7D%2B5)
Since
![s_1=21](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_1%3D21)
, we have
![s_2=s_1+5](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_2%3Ds_1%2B5)
![s_3=s_2+5=s_1+2\cdot5](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_3%3Ds_2%2B5%3Ds_1%2B2%5Ccdot5)
![s_4=s_3+5=s_1+3\cdot5](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_4%3Ds_3%2B5%3Ds_1%2B3%5Ccdot5)
![\cdots](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ccdots)
![s_n=s_{n-1}+5=\cdots=s_1+(n-1)\cdot5](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_n%3Ds_%7Bn-1%7D%2B5%3D%5Ccdots%3Ds_1%2B%28n-1%29%5Ccdot5)
So the explicit rule for the sequence
![s_n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_n)
is
![s_n=21+5(n-1)\implies s_n=5n+16](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_n%3D21%2B5%28n-1%29%5Cimplies%20s_n%3D5n%2B16)
In the 15th row, the number of seats is
![s_{15}=5(15)+16=91](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s_%7B15%7D%3D5%2815%29%2B16%3D91)
2. Let
![p_n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_n)
be the amount of profit in the
![n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n)
-th year. If the profits increase by 6% each year, we would have
![p_2=p_1+0.06p_1=1.06p_1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_2%3Dp_1%2B0.06p_1%3D1.06p_1)
![p_3=1.06p_2=1.06^2p_1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_3%3D1.06p_2%3D1.06%5E2p_1)
![p_4=1.06p_3=1.06^3p_1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_4%3D1.06p_3%3D1.06%5E3p_1)
![\cdots](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ccdots)
![p_n=1.06p_{n-1}=\cdots=1.06^{n-1}p_1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_n%3D1.06p_%7Bn-1%7D%3D%5Ccdots%3D1.06%5E%7Bn-1%7Dp_1)
with
![p_1=40,000](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_1%3D40%2C000)
.
The second part of the question is somewhat vague - are we supposed to find the profits in the 20th year alone? the total profits in the first 20 years? I'll assume the first case, in which we would have a profit of
![p_{20}=1.06^{19}\cdot40,000\approx121,024](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_%7B20%7D%3D1.06%5E%7B19%7D%5Ccdot40%2C000%5Capprox121%2C024)
3. Now let
![p_n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_n)
denote the number of pushups done in the
![n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n)
-th week. Since
![3\cdot4=12](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3%5Ccdot4%3D12)
,
![12\cdot4=48](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=12%5Ccdot4%3D48)
, and
![48\cdot4=192](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=48%5Ccdot4%3D192)
, it looks like we can expect the number of pushups to quadruple per week. So,
![p_n=4p_{n-1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_n%3D4p_%7Bn-1%7D)
starting with
![p_1=3](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_1%3D3)
.
We can apply the same reason as in (2) to find the explicit rule for the sequence, which you'd find to be