Answer:
The 17-1800s period called "The Enlightenment" made the American colonist believe several things against King George III or an absolute monarchy:
1. The king should not have full authority.
2. The American should take independence from the British, specifically King George III.
3. The king was unfair to the Americans.
Explanation:
The Enlightenment was a period where philosophers used a different way of thinking to solve problems. An example of a text from this period is "Common Sense" by Thomas Paine.
This book explained how King George had been unfair to and ignored the American colonist. It also supported the fact that Americans should become independent from the British and make their own nation, which is known as the United States today.
Contributions like these go against an absolute monarchy where the king holds most if not all the high power of the land among man. Instead, it supports the fact of the people of having a say in the government and the authority.
Answer:
There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"
If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.
Explanation:
hope this helps
The answer is false because it is common sense.
Your answer is a, b and c
The correct answer would be
• destructive to •
Have a nice day/night :)
