Answer:
The $500 is the opportunity cost.
Explanation:
The sunk cost can be defined as a cost that has already been incurred. Such as cost can no longer be recovered. A sunk cost is considered to be irrelevant and is excluded from decision making.
If an individual decided to take an accounting course and paid the tuition fee of $500 and gets a job offer later. If he/she decides to take up the job the tuition fee paid will be the sunk cost which cannot be recovered anymore.
Hiring these people is known as "staffing".
The way toward enlisting appropriate candidates as per their insight and aptitudes in an association is named as staffing.
Viable staff administration is fundamental to guaranteeing your working environment runs easily and productively, and that the correct representatives are in the correct positions. Then again, poor staffing can bring about a confused, disorderly workplace, which can possibly influence your organization to lose profitable business.
Answer:
increases
higher
more
lower
lower
Explanation:
If the money supply is increased. individuals would have more money and consumption would increase. Increase in consumption would lead to a rise in demand.
when demand exceeds supply, prices rise,
When there is a rise in price, it encourages producers to increase production in order to increase their profit margin.
In order to expand production, more factors of production would be needed. So, more labour would be hired. thus, unemployment would fall.
it can be seen that higher inflation lowers unemployment
D is the answer to your question
Answer:
Why can't the Fed push the rate any lower than zero?
Real interest rates can be lower than zero, or negative (because inflation rate is higher than interest rate), but nominal interest rates are generally only limited to zero. But during this same time, the European Central Bank actually started paying negative interest rates on money deposits and many European private banks followed. That means that they charged people for having their money on the bank.
Why do you think that the Fed was so seemingly reluctant to push the rate all the way to the floor?
The reason why the Fed was not willing to push the interest rates to zero or even below zero was that by doing so, the US dollar would have depreciated or lost value. In Europe this was done to encourage people to spend their money and not save as much, but in the US that is not really a problem. Generally in the US the problem is that people spend too much and save too little, but on some European countries and Japan, people tend to save too much. For example in Japan the national savings rate fluctuates between 22-40%, while the maximum savings rate in the US has been 10.4% in 1960, it currently is around 7.6%.
