Answer:
Flint Corporation current assets section of Balance Sheet
Particulars Amount
Cash ($23,500 + 21,100) 43,600
Less: Restricted for plant expansion <u> 23,500</u> <u>21,100</u>
Trading Securities 9,700
Accounts receivable 73,300
Less: Allowance for bad debts <u>3,700</u> 69,600
Interest receivables (19,600*7%*9/12) 1,029
Inventories
Finished goods 33,300
Work in Progress 13,000
Raw materials <u>59,600</u>
Total Current Assets <u>186,229</u>
It is much easier to increase government spending, because it gives a temporary boost, whereas decreasing it would take away the benefits you had before, and might mess up other "things" that relied on that part you just removed to decrease government spending.
Answer:
Hannah will lose her suit.
Explanation:
Niels and Hannah did not have a binding deal. They did not decide on a specific lot of land or on a price. It is never even decided how the two of them will decide on a fair method of agreeing on the price. Don't be fooled by words like binding contract. The terms are too vague and therefore Hannah will ultimately lose the case.
Answer:
The answer is: D) inseparability
Explanation:
Inseparability in marketing means that you can't separate the production of the service from its consumption.
In other words, the doctor who offers the service comes together with the service he offers.
The doctor may have treated Sean's health issues in a correct manner and probably helped to cure Sean, but if Sean doesn't like the doctor then he will not return. Sean can not separate the doctor form the service he delivers.
