All categories

3 years ago

Which of these is a worker who is NOT covered by the OSH Act?

2 answers:

8 0

The OSH Act covers most private sector employers and their employees in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other U.S. territories. Coverage is provided either directly by the Federal OSHA or by an OSHA-approved state job safety and health plan.

Juli2301 [7.4K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

These are the workers or employees which are not covered by OSHA Act:

Self-employed people or workers,
The family farms which do not cover the criteria set by the institution(OSHA).
The local government and state employees of those companies which are not registered with the OSHA.

Explanation:

<u>OSH(Occupational safety and health):</u>

The OSH Act is basically embodied to provide the basic facilities to all the workers associated with the projects that that are registered OSHA(Occupational Safety and Health Administration).

While the OSH Act does covers mostly the employees of the private sector. But, it does have some exemptions to that as it does not cover most of the employees due to there employer being unregistered with the institution.

You might be interested in

Future Value of Annuity. Twins Jessica andJoshua, both 25, graduated from college andbegan working in the family restaurant busi

pav-90 [236]

Answer:

Jessica will have $611,816.70 at retirement.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Jessica:

Annual contribution in IRA for 10 years = $2,000

Retirement age = 65 years

Interest rate per year = 10%

Annuity value for investing $2,000 annually is $35,062.33

FV (Future Value) $35,062.33

PV (Present Value) $13,518.05

N (Number of Periods) 10.000

I/Y (Interest Rate) 10.000%

PMT (Periodic Payment) $2,000.00

Starting Investment $0.00

Total Principal $20,000.00

Total Interest $15,062.33

Amount received after investing $35,062.33 for 30 years.

Using an online finance calculator:

FV (Future Value) $611,816.70

PV (Present Value) $35,062.33

N (Number of Periods) 30.000

I/Y (Interest Rate) 10.000%

PMT (Periodic Payment) $0.00

Starting Investment $35,062.33

Total Principal $35,062.33

Total Interest $576,754.37

7 0

2 years ago

A rule of nature that tells you what will happen under certain conditions is a

Naddik [55]

I guess the correct answer is Scientific Law.

Scientific Law is rule of nature that tells you what will happen under certain conditions.

5 0

3 years ago

On January 1, 2018, Burleson Corporation’s projected benefit obligation was $48 million. During 2018 pension benefits paid by th

aleksklad [387]

Answer:

$59.8 million.

Explanation:

At the beginning of the year, the Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) was $48 million, however, during the year this amount was affected by several factors that are explained in the problem statement: the service cost ($13 million), the interest costs (defined by a discount rate of 10%) and the pension benefits paid by the company ($6 million).

To understand how it was modified exactly, first, we will do a theoretical analysis and then present it more <em>graphically</em> as a financial statement.

1. Theoretical analysis

Firstly, a Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) is a measure that reflects how much a company needs at the present time (December 31, 2018) to cover future pension liabilities. We know that the year began with a PBO of $48 million. However, this amount must be added to the service costs ($13 million), which is the increase in the present value of the liabilities, because the employees have completed another year in the company and that implies an increase in their pension credit.

Therefore, so far, the PBO at December 31, 2018 is $61 million. To this amount must be added the interest cost which is the annual interest amount on the unpaid balance of the PBO. In this case, an interest rate of 10% is handled. Therefore the amount of interest is equal to $48 million (original PBO) * 10% = 4.8 million.

So far, the PBO at December 31, 2018 is $61 + $4.8 = $65.8 million

Finally, the pension benefits paid by the trustee during 2018 should be subtracted, since they are a partial payment of the PBO.

Therefore, we have: $65.8 - $6 = $59.8

2. As a financial statement.

Pension obligations

Year Ended At December 31, 2018

Change in benefit obligations

Beginning PBO $48

Service cost $13

Interest cost $4.8

Benefits paid ($6.0)

Ending PBO $59.8

6 0

3 years ago

Clancy is a bus driver who enjoys donuts and muffins. Suppose that the price of donuts increases. As a result, the purchasing po

FromTheMoon [43]

Answer:

INCOME EFFECT

Explanation:

Income Effect means change in real income/ purchasing power due to change in price, income staying same.

Price Increase reduces real income/ purchasing power, income staying same - because consumer can purchase less from same income.
Price decrease increases real income/ purchasing power, income staying same - because consumer can purchase more from same income.

Eg: Income, price of a consumer = Rs100, Rs10 respectively.

Real Income = Income/price = 100/10 = 10. Price fall to 8 increases purchasing power to 12.5 (100/8). Price rise to 12 decreases purchasing power to 8.3 (100/12).

Income Effect : stating - lower purchasing power at higher prices, reduces consumption of all goods and higher purchasing power at lower prices, increases consumption of all goods.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following statements is NOT true of a department in the merchandise classification scheme? it is the second level i

Eva8 [605]

The first one is true I think

7 0

3 years ago