Answer: The answer is 22,452
Step-by-step explanation: Multiply 6×2 which will be 12
Put the 1 from the 12 on top of the 4 then do 4×6+1 it will equal 25
Then put the 2 on top of the 7 then do 7×6+2 it will equal 44
Then put the 4 on top of the 3 then do 3×6+4 it will equal 22
And that's how you get your answer.
Answer:
x = 6
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
6x² - 2x + 36 = 5x² + 10x ( subtract 5x² + 10x from both sides )
x² - 12x + 36 = 0 ← in standard form
This is a perfect square of the form
(x - a)² = x² - 2ax + a²
36 = 6² ⇒ a = 6 and 2ax = (2 × 6)x = 12x, hence
(x - 6)² = 0
x - 6 = 0 ⇒ x = 6
Instead of typing it all on here, I included my explanations with the work.
Count what fraction receive Karen, James and Frank in total:
since
Karen receives - 
,
James receives - 
,
Frank receives - 
,
then 
.
All inheritance is the whole 1, then for Dan remains 
.
Answer: Dan receives one quarter of the inheritance.
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.
