Answer:
The answer is "the third choice".
Explanation:
In this question, the picket fence use for separating the two neighbors, Molly and Sandy, which is growing neighbor has both a tomato or pepper garden. although Molly was a more powerful grower with peppers, she would sell them to Sandy in return with tomatoes, almost as Molly and Sandy profit through trade.
Answer:
Neither nominal damages nor punitive damages.
Explanation:
Nominal damage is defined as money from a defendant that is awarded to a plaintiff for a legal wrong. The amount awarded does not meet up to the financial loss incurred.
Punitive damage is the type that is awarded to punish the defendant for an injury or wrong done to a plaintiff. This is also called exemplary damages.
In the given scenario the owner will not be able to recover either punitive or nominal damages from the movers.
This is because movers used a rope and pulley apparatus to lift the anvils on the outside of the building to a second-story window. This was aimed at not harming anyone within the building.
Also when it fell the anvil was not even dented.
So there was no basis for the negligence charge as there was no injury inflicted.
<span>To first solve this problem, we have to set up ratios based on the data given. First, we know that the dishwasher use rate is 700 watts/run. Next, we know 1 hr/run. Finally, we know there are 150 runs/year. To calculate how much energy per year, we arrange the ratios to give a final answer of watts/year. Doing this we get the following: 150 runs/year * 700 watts/run = 105,000 watts/year which is also equal to 105 kw/year. The ration of 1 hour per run does not make a difference in this question and is not needed for the final answer.</span>
Answer:
D) $4,200
Explanation:
Martin's expenses on land = taxes of $2,800 + mortgage interest of $900 a+ liability insurance of $500 = $4,200
This is net profit, which is the revenue earned after costs are deducted.