All categories

3 years ago

How do you graph the quadratic

Mathematics

1 answer:

iragen [17]3 years ago

3 0

To factor this quadratic function, there are many ways that you can do this, the most common approach used to graph anything would be to make a table of values. Basically, make a chart with x coordinates on one side and y coordinates on the other side. Pick any values for your x coordinates and then find the correct y coordinate that results when you place that specific x coordinate into the function. After getting many points, plot those points on the grid and it should give you a parabola.

Another way to graph the function is to find the x intercepts, you can do this by setting the function to zero, and factoring the trinomial, using the appropriate method, then find the x intercepts

y = 2x^2 - 8x + 6

0 = (2x^2 - 6x - 2x + 6)

0 = 2x(x - 3) - 2(x - 3)

0 = (2x - 2)(x - 3).

You might be interested in

You and a friend tutor for a total of 12 hours. Use the tape diagram to find how many hours you tutor.

ElenaW [278]

Answer:

There’s no tape diagram

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Please help with at least 1 question. I’m really stressed

Art [367]

Please help with at least one question I’m really stressed

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Due tomorrow plz help. D-F3

Nostrana [21]

D.
slope = -3
passing thru(4,3)
y = mx + b
3 = -3(4) + b
b = 15

equation
y = -3x + 15

E.
(4,5)(6,9)
slope = (9-5)/(6-4) = 4/2 = 2
passing thru (4,5)(6,9)
y = mx + b
5 = 2(4) + b
b = -3

equation
y = 2x - 3

8 0

3 years ago

Please help ASAP! Due in a hour! :) answer both and I will thank and mark as brainliest

lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

22: 45 and 126

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, McDonald’s had 33 orders that were not accurate among 362 orders o

melomori [17]

Answer:

A. We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B. Null hypothesis: $p=0.1$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.1$

C. $z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558$

D. $z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96$ $z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96$

E. Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F. So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=362 represent the random sample taken

X=33 represent the number of orders not accurate

$\hat p=\frac{33}{363}=0.0912$ estimated proportion of orders not accurate

$p_o=0.10$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

A: Write the claim as a mathematical statement involving the population proportion p

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B: State the null (H0) and alternative (H1) hypotheses

Null hypothesis: $p=0.1$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.1$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

C: Find the test statistic

Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558$

D: Find the critical value(s)

Since is a bilateral test we have two critical values. We need to look on the normal standard distribution a quantile that accumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail. And for this case we have:

$z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96$ $z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96$

P value

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(z$

E: Would you Reject or Fail to Reject the null (H0) hypothesis.

Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F: Write the conclusion of the test.

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.

6 0

3 years ago