The statement which states that a management contract is an arrangement in which one firm contracts with another to <em>produce products</em> to its specifications is false
According to the given question, we are asked to show whether a management contract is one where there is an arrangement between two firms to <em>produce its goods </em>to its specifications.
As a result of this, we can see that a management contract is one where one firm gives its management skills <em>in part or in full</em> to another firm.
With this in mind, we can see that contract manufacturing is one where there is an arrangement in which one firm contracts with another to <em>produce products</em> to its specifications but is in charge of the marketing.
Therefore, the correct answer is false.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/17440307
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Opportunity cost refers to those costs that can help us save more money. When we move from one investment to another, then the additional income from the other investment is called opportunity cost.
In this case, if Joe chooses Invest in a bank deposit in the place of Gold coins, he can enjoy 3% more return at the place of no profit and loss, so Joe had loss his 3% opportunity cost.
President Kennedy aimed to provide economic assistance, and consolidate democracy and social justice in Latin America.
Kennedy proposed, via the corporation for international improvement and the Alliance for progress, both launched in 1961, to mortgage greater than $20 billion to Latin American nations that would sell democracy and adopt significant social reforms, specifically in making land possession possible for more numbers.
The Peace Corps, a program that despatched younger volunteers to foreign places to assist those in want, turned into probably one of the high-quality-acknowledged New Frontier programs.
Learn more about President Kennedy here: brainly.com/question/13721861
#SPJ4
<u>Full question:</u>
Marcos wants to buy Lucia’s land, but she refuses to sell. Marcos begins using subpoenas, court orders, and other formal legal procedures in an unrelenting effort to force Lucia to sell. This is
abuse of process.
not a tort.
appropriation.
wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
<u>Answer:</u>
This is
abuse of process
<u>Explanation:</u>
Abuse of process assigns to the inappropriate handling of a civil or criminal justice system for an unintended, wicked, or malicious reason. It is the hateful and intentional abuse of frequently published civil or criminal court means that is not supported by the underlying legal action.
Abuse of process covers prosecution claims in defective faith that is expected to hold the commitment of justice. Abuse of process is a deliberate tort. Abuse of process comprises the complete range of modes conflict to the prosecution process such as hearing proceedings, the noticing of allegations and the issuing of subpoenas.
Answer:
c. corporate officers.
Explanation:
In the case when the potential obligation is to be avoided for any misconduct while having operations in the corporate so the directors could refrain from the supervision of the delegated work to the corporate officers so that the work could not harm that result in help in attains the goals & objectives
Therefore the option c is correct
