The answer to the question above is option C: they can result in a channel member having too much control. Firstly, we define what vertical system is. From the term itself vertical, the formation of the members is from top to bottom. Therefore, this includes the <span>producer, wholesaler, and retailer and this is where the distribution channel occurs. The reason why this kind of system is a business ethic issue is due to channel members that might have too much control because of their positions and unequal distribution of tasks. </span>
Answer:Percentage change in the book price =7.17%
Explanation:
Initial Price of the used book = $73.25
Discounted price = $68.00
Percentage change in the book price = Initial Price - Discounted price/ Initial Price) x 100
($73.25 - $68.00) /$73.25 =5.25 /$73.25 =0.07167
=7.17%
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
$267.1211
Explanation:
return on preference share per unit is $6 , thus at 12% annual rate of return. Initial value of preference shares will be $50 per unit ( $6 divided by 12%).
Total value of preference shares = $50 multiplied by 100 preference shares = $5000
Future value of preference shares = 5000 (1.12)^5 = $8,811.7084
to find the value of money to be deposited to be able to buy the preference shares at the end of 5 yrs.
we work back to get the present value using the mutual fund annual rate
$8811.7084 = pv (1.06)^60 the rate is compounded monthly. Hence we shall compound the return 60 times in 5 years
Bank account money = 8811.7084 divided by 32.9877 = $267.1211
good debt is for buying assets : things that will be worth more in the future
bad debt is for buying liabilities : things that will be worth less in the future
