Answer:
1. Nothing can be left in the past.
Explanation:
Ray Bradbury's "A Sound of Thunder" is a science fiction story set in the year 2055. It revolves around the story of a man going back into the past to enjoy hunting dinosaurs but ended up disturbing the past.
In the story, the character Eckles had hired a travel agency, "Time Safari Inc." to take him back to the age of dinosaurs so that he can go on a hunting expedition. While there, they began shooting the dinosaurs but were asked to retrieve the bullets as they cannot leave anything behind. The tour guide, Travis explains, <em>"The bullets! The bullets can't be left behind. They don't belong in the Past; they might change anything."</em>
Thus, the correct answer is option 1.
Answer:
b. The text highlights exciting events to keep the reader’s attention.
c. The text indicates that the story is moving toward a key event in the text.
Explanation:
Answer:
The earth is a vast ecosystem that was created by natural forces. Through mankind's touch this has drastically changed. A sort of butterfly effect occurs whenever man intervenes with nature. For example, building a dam stops water flow, dries up the river bed, and forces native animals to relocate or die. Everything that mankind has done to the earth hurts the natural course of how nature grows and flows. By doing this the earth has become poisoned, and therefore mankind is poisoning his home and himself.
Its six sentences but here you go. Modify to how it best suits you.
<span>The inference about Oona that is supported by details in this sentence is that she used to live at the great fort with Ivan and the Russians. Ivan IV was nicknamed "The Terrible" because of his rotten character but a very efficient ruler. He is a very paranoid person until Anastasia became his wife. Whenever Anastasia was around, he was really good to people and a lot of good things has happened during his term. When his wife died, he changed for the worst. During his reign, his goal was to decrease the number of nobility of his country and allow common people to be vocal about their intentions and voices.
</span>
I personally agree with this. However, only in certain conditions. If the United States was put in another World War or something to where it was fought on the homefront of very close and the U.S. was losing, they would have to do it in order for our country to survive.
The United States should not pass this without a VERY good reason. Although people should volunteer to risk their lives for our freedom and safety, It should not be required. There are some people who just are not fit for combat and some who should not be put through it. It should be a choice.
This country is about freedom. Being forced to join the army or military would be the opposite of freedom. This is supposed to be a country where the people rule, not where they are forced into combat. However, as stated before if it was ABSOLUTELY needed for us to survive as a country then it would be acceptable.
