Answer:
value of new lagoon will be $4.05 million
Explanation:
We have given cost = $2.3 million
It is given that new lagoon will be 65% larger
So size of lagoon will be 1+0.65 =1.65
Sizing exponent for this project is given 1.13
So x = 1.13
New lagoon is given by 
So new lagoon will be equal to 
$ million
So value of new lagoon will be $4.05 million
The alpha of the stock is <u>6.6%</u>.
Alpha is also a degree of risk. With an alpha of - 15 means, the investment changed into far too risky given the go back. An alpha of 0 suggests that an asset has earned a return commensurate with the risk. Alpha of more than 0 means an investment outperformed, after adjusting for volatility. The process to calculate the alpha of the stock is: 0.12-[0.33+1.2(0.10+0.33)]= 0.066 = 0.066 * 100 = 6.6%
The expected return on monetary funding is the predicted fee of its return. it is a measure of the middle of the distribution of the random variable this is the return.
The risk-free rate is the rate of return offered by funding that consists of zero threat. Each investment asset contains a few levels of risk but is small, so the risk-free fee is something of a theoretical idea. In exercise, it is considered to be the interest rate paid on brief-term government debt.
Learn more about risk-free rates here brainly.com/question/19568670
#SPJ4
Answer:
c) Investment in a DPP (Direct Participation Program)
Explanation:
Direct Participation Programs are a form of limited partnership. DPP has the lack of liquidity, since ownership interests are not always freely transferrable and require the approval of a general partner of the DPP. Each of the other items listed are more liquid on a short-term basis. Bonds can be sold, bond fund shares can be redeemed, equities are easily sold in the secondary market, and though CDs are not transferrable, the maximum maturity is 1 year or less, so the client would have short-term access to the funds invested.
Using economic understanding, insurance is "<u>Economically feasible</u>" when the possible loss is relatively large compared to the premium amount.
This is because when an individual insured on a premium account loses huge properties that are considerably large compared to the premium paid, this is economically feasible to such an individual.
For example, if an individual has his vehicle worth $1 million on damaged but has only paid less than $100,000 as insurance fee, such individual would have his car replaced by the insurance firm, despite only paying 10 percent of the car price as insurance fee.
Thus, this situation is considered <u>economically feasible.</u>
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Economically feasible."</u>
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13769098
