1. The idea behind the concept of multiple intelligences is that human intelligence can take different "modalities," as opposed to being dominated by a single general ability. I think this is a valid construct, as it approaches the concept of "intelligence" from various different angles, not always considered when discussing intelligence in other contexts.
2. As we do not have access to this text, we are not able to answer this section of the question.
3. One way in which the developers of a test of multiple intelligences could demonstrate the validity of the test using evidence would be by also researching the behaviour of the people who took the test out in the real world. They could compare these results to the results of the test. In this way, they would be more likely to find out whether the intelligences mentioned in the test are indeed exercised in real life.
4. A passage from the Bible that could support this idea would be the following:
<em>1 Corinthians 12:12-14 – "Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ. For we were all baptised by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink. Even so the body is not made up of one part but of many."</em>
In this passage, the idea of many parts within a single body is presented. However, it is also stated that the many parts of the body in fact end up forming a single entity. This is similar to the multiple intelligences that combine to give a single personality capable of certain things.
The answer is<u> "increase physical exercise".</u>
Various studies in the previous couple of years have given confirmation that physical exercise can enhance the impacts of aging on the mind, in terms both of avoiding or delaying dementia, and diminishing the more ordinary age-related decrease in cognitive function. While the subjective advantages of physical exercise for kids and more youthful grown-ups are less clear, there is some proof that there might be some advantage, despite the fact that not to indistinguishable degree from for older adults.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The process of learning involves perception, the way we perceive things from the environment or in school. Then it comes to process the information, which means the wat we think about what we are observing. We reflect on it and conceptualize to better understand. Then, we have to put into action what we learn in order to totally understand it. To master what we learn, we have to practice it once or twice until we get it.
I believe the answer is: <span>formal operational
During </span>formal operational stage, most people would started to develop the ability to develop abstract concept which granted us the ability to create a hypothesis. On average, <span>formal operational stage happen when we're around 12 years old or older.</span>
