All categories

4 years ago

The presence of formal labor organizations in the united states dates back to the

1 answer:

ivann1987 [24]4 years ago

6 0

HEY THERE.

THE CORRECT ANSWER IS The presence of formal labor organizations in the united states dates back to the LATE 1700S

HOPE IT HELPS THANK YOU :)

You might be interested in

Which action will help increase a low FICO score?

Andreas93 [3]

Reducing credit card balances is the action will help increase a low FICO score.

The FICO mortgage score is between 300 and 850. Higher scores indicate lower credit risk. Each individual actually has 65 credit scores for the FICO scoring model because each of three national credit bureaus, Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, has its own database.

8 0

3 years ago

One bond has a coupon rate of 5.4%, another a coupon rate of 8.2%. Both bonds pay interest annually, have 13-year maturities, an

Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

a. rate or return bond 1 6.6% bond 2 7.71%

b. Does the higher-coupon bond give a higher rate of return? yes

Explanation:

bond 1 has a coupon rate of 5.4%

bond 2 has a coupon rate of 8.2%

yield to maturity formula = {C + [(Face value - market value) / n]} / [(Face value + market value) / 2]

assume bond 1's face value = $1,000

coupon = 54

n = 13

YTM = 7.5%

0.075 = {54 + [(1,000 - M) / 13]} / [(1,000 + M) / 2]

0.075 x [(1,000 + M) / 2] = 54 + [(1,000 - M) / 13]

0.075 x (500 + 0.5M) = 54 + 76.92 - 0.0769M

37.50 + 0.0375M = 130.92 - 0.0769M

0.0375M + 0.0769M = 130.92 - 37.50

0.1144M = 93.42

M = 93.42 / 0.1142 = $818.04

rate of return = $54 / $818.04 = 0.066 = 6.6%

assume bond 2's face value = $1,000

coupon = 82

n = 13

YTM = 7.5%

0.075 = {82 + [(1,000 - M) / 13]} / [(1,000 + M) / 2]

0.075 x [(1,000 + M) / 2] = 82 + [(1,000 - M) / 13]

0.075 x (500 + 0.5M) = 82 + 76.92 - 0.0769M

37.50 + 0.0375M = 158.92 - 0.0769M

0.0375M + 0.0769M = 158.92 - 37.50

0.1144M = 121.42

M = 121.42 / 0.1142 = $1,063.22

rate of return = $82 / $1,063.22 = 0.07712 = 7.71%

8 0

3 years ago

Martha Manufacturing produces a single product that sells for $80. Variable costs per unit equal $32. The company expects total

garri49 [273]

Each unit sells: $80
Each unit costs to make: $32
Fixed costs: 72,000
Goal: 2,000 units sold

If they meet their goal, let's see how that would go:

(2,000 * 80) - (2,000 * 32) - 72,000 = ?
160,000 - 64,000 - 72,000 = 24,000

24,000 is the profit they would make for hitting their goal.

Question 1:
What is the break-even point? The break-even means they make no money, but they also lose no money. So that final number (24,000) would be 0 instead. How many units would they have to make to hit zero?
(x * 80) - (x * 32) - 72,000 = 0.
80x - 32x = 72,000
48x = 72,000
x = 1500 units

We can verify by using our first formula we've already determined, using this new value for units.
(1,500* 80) - (1,500 * 32) - 72,000 = ?
120,000 - 48,000 - 72,000 = 0? True!

Question 2: If they increase their expenses by 16,000, what is their new break even point?

(x * 80) - (x * 32) - 72,000 - 16000 = 0.
80x - 32x - 88000 = 0
48x = 88000
x = 1833

Question 3: 10% reduction in selling price and 10% increase in sales. (Assuming based off the original formula the problem provided.)

Original: (2,000 * 80) - (2,000 * 32) - 72,000 = ?

10% Reduction in price: 8
80-8 = 72

10% increase in sales: 200
2000 + 200 = 2200

Plugin to our formula:
(2200 * 72) - (2200 * 32) - 72,000 = ?
158400 - 70400 - 72,000 = 16,000

Since this number is positive, this is income. (D)

7 0

4 years ago

Q 5.34: A wholesaler offers credit terms 1/10, n/30. A fabric store bought goods worth $6,500 from the wholesaler. Within the di

AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

the wholesaler received $6,138 as payment.

Explanation:

The seller would receive the the amount owing to customer less the return credit and cash discount of 1 %.

The calculation of this amount is as follows :

Account Receivable $6,500

Less Return Credit ($300)

$6,200

Less Cash discount ($6,200 × 1%) ($62)

Payment $6,138

Conclusion :

the wholesaler received $6,138 as payment.

6 0

4 years ago

It is often said that high rates of inflation tend to diminish people's incentive to save and invest. this view must be incorrec

SOVA2 [1]

Of the following, the best criticism of the argument above is that it overlooks the possibility that certain factors operating in the 1980’s but not in the 1970’s diminished people’s incentive to save and invest.
If these other factors, unrelated to the inflation rate, that operated in the 1980’s but not the 1970’s, created an even greater disincentive to savings and investment than high inflation rates provide, then those trends do not provide evidence about the general relationship among savings, investment, and inflation.

5 0

3 years ago