Answer:
nope yor are dfrfvswronf ghfg unjhojgdtojgbmuthtjhgngth4nyhrmthjnrtgn trgrvt3h
Answer:
it would be segregation and free speech
Explanation:
Answer: allowing a child to interpret in an emergency
Explanation:
Under the ACA Section 1557, we should note that there should not be any form of discrimination against anyone simply because such person cannot speak English.
Therefore, in a scenario whereby there is someone with limited English proficiency, the most likely to action to be allowed is to allow a child to interpret in the case of an emergency.
I support whatever you choose to put your answer as lol
