Answer:
first graph: 1/3
second graph: 1
third graph: 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
count how many blocks it moves up for rise and count how many blocks it moves to the right or left for run. Then just put it as Rise/Run.
Answer:
(B) 
Step-by-step explanation:
(A) The given expression is: 
=
The value of this expression is 8 which is greater than the base of the expression that is 2.
(B) The given expression is:
=
=
The value of this expression is 0.09 which is smaller than the base of the given expression that is 0.83.
(C) The given expression is: 
=
The value of this expression is 9 which is greater than the base of the given expression that is 3.
(D) The given expression is: 
=
The value of this expression is 256 which is greater than the base of the given expression that is 4.
Hence, Option B is correct.
Add 3/8 and 1/4 together which equals 5/8. Then, divide 16 by 5/8. Then, you have an answer of 5/128
Answer:
greater I think
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<u>1. Yes</u>
<u>2. 83%</u>
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
Does microwaving significantly improve indicators of future breaking?
Yes, this is because the normal requirements based on the 95% confidence implies having a deviation of only 5%. That is, it should fall within 5% of 65 newly baked crackers =5% x 65= 3.25. Thus, since only 3 of the 65 microwaved crackers showed visible cracking we could be confident.
How large is the improvement? What do you conclude about the idea of microwaving crackers?
<em>Approximately there was an 83.08% (57/65 *100 - 3/65 *100) improvement.</em>
The conclusion is that there is a statistically significant relationship between microwaving and reducing cracking.
