Answer:
Las 5 principales recomendaciones para evitar un conflicto son:
1- Escuchar a la otra persona: en caso de una diferencia de criterios u opiniones, es necesario escuchar lo que el otro tiene que decir para evitar un choque de opiniones innecesario.
2- Ponerse en el lugar del otro: no solamente es necesario escuchar, sino también intentar comprender la opinión y los pensamientos del otro.
3- No hacer lo que no le gustaría que le hagan: es un principio que debería ser rector en las relaciones humanas, es decir, no se debería lastimar a otro si uno no quiere ser lastimado.
4- Evitar las controversias: no ir al choque intentando debatir temas controvertidos.
5- No ser egoísta: no pensar siempre en el propio beneficio, sino también en el de las personas que nos rodean.
A su vez, los 5 beneficios de una convivencia armoniosa son la paz y tranquilidad en el hogar, la sensación de bienestar y falta de stress a nivel personal, una mayor estabilidad psicológica que afecta al rendimiento laboral, una mejor calidad de vida y una sensación de compañía y estabilidad emocional.
Its A Long Statement But,
<span>During the late 1800's many Americans feared immigration because they thought that immigrants would take jobs from hard working Americans. During this time, you saw the nativist American party pop up (although it quickly dissolved), you have the Chinese Exclusion act (which, as the name implies excludes all Chinese immigration), but you also have people like Jane Addams, who wanted to promote immigration and set up the Hull House, a community centre to help immigrants first arriving.</span>
The correct answer is alternative C.
The United States Constitution expressly forbids the government to pass <em>ex post facto</em> laws, which are laws that can change the legal consequences of actions in the past. In some countries <em>ex post facto</em> laws are acceptable in some situations, but in the U.S. this is such an unacceptable thing that it seemed obvious and unnecessary to include in the Constitution.
Answer:
Yes. But only on the land that wasn't pre-occupied by the native.
Explanation:
The vast majority of the land in North America at the time was inhabited. Coming to this territory to form farms and towns would not bother any particularly group of people.
The creation for farms and towns itself wasn't immoral.
But, doing so while taking the ancestral land of the locals and forced them to moved away or kill them is considered as 'immoral'. There were plenty of space that hey can occupied without doing so.
The answer is C, the executive branch mainly enforces federal laws!
} I hope this helped {
