1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Art [367]
3 years ago
13

How can doctors best detect medical problems? by using a radioactive isotope to kill unwanted cells and target diseased tissue b

y measuring the half-life of an isotope found in the skin with high-energy gamma radiation from outside the body by injecting a radioactive isotope that travels to the target tissue and measures the amount of radioactive decay by administering a drug that targets replicating cells
Social Studies
2 answers:
faust18 [17]3 years ago
6 0
I think the answer would be  by injecting a radioactive isotope. 
ValentinkaMS [17]3 years ago
3 0

i think its A) by using a radioactive isotope to kill unwanted cells and target diseased tissue

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP A major development in relations between the Soviet Union and the United States occurred in the late 1980’s when the
White raven [17]

Answer:

About the author

Rebecca Johnson

Rebecca Johnson is Executive Director of the Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy.

Established upon the ashes of the Second World War to represent “We the Peoples”, it is not surprising that both peace and security were fundamental objectives for the United Nations. While many also wanted disarmament, countervailing lessons were drawn by some political leaders, which made it difficult to get multilateral agreements on disarmament for several decades. Debates around nuclear weapons epitomized and sharpened the challenges. Academics in the United States of America led in developing theories of deterrence to provide legitimacy for these weapons of mass destruction, which soon became embedded in the military doctrines and political rhetoric of further Governments, from NATO allies to the Eastern bloc and beyond. Deterrence theory sought to invert the normative relationship between peace and disarmament by arguing that nuclear weapons were actually peacekeepers amassed to deter aggressors rather than to fight them. From there it became a short step for some countries—including permanent Members of the Security Council of the United Nations—to promote ideologies that equated security and peace with high “defence” budgets and military-industrial dependence on arms manufacture and trade. This is the backdrop for understanding how the United Nations System and disarmament approaches have intersected since 1945, and the way in which reframing disarmament as a universal humanitarian imperative has opened more productive opportunities for future multilateral disarmament treaties.

The very first resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations, in January 1946, addressed the “problems raised by the discovery of atomic energy”. Despite civil society’s efforts, led by scientists and women’s peace organizations, leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union rejected measures to curb nuclear ambitions. As the cold war took hold, the leaders that had emerged “victorious” in 1945 raced each other to manufacture and deploy all kinds of new weapons and war technologies, especially nuclear, chemical and biological weapons (notwithstanding the 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibiting the use of chemical and biological weapons in war) and a variety of missiles to deliver them speedily anywhere in the world.

After early efforts to control nuclear developments floundered, it was the upsurge of health and environmental concerns provoked by nuclear testing that led the Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the Japanese Parliament to call for such explosions to be halted altogether. After an egregiously irresponsible 15 megaton thermonuclear bomb was tested in the Marshall Islands on 1 March 1954, Nehru submitted his proposal for a Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) to the United Nations Disarmament Commission on 29 July 1954. Since then CTBT has been the centrepiece of disarmament demands from many States, especially the developing countries of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Intended as a first step towards disarmament, the driving force behind CTBT was concern about the humanitarian impacts. Early attempts at multilateral negotiations through a newly created Ten-Nation Committee on Disarmament made little progress. Although the leaders of the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom professed their desire for a CTBT, their talks kept stalling. Obstacles from the nuclear laboratories and security advisors were dressed up as verification problems, but they stemmed from these nuclear-armed Governments’ military ambitions and rivalries, and their shared determination to keep their own weapons options open, even as they sought to limit those of others.

From 1959 to 1961, various resolutions were adopted by the General Assembly aimed at preventing the testing, acquisition, use, deployment and proliferation of nuclear weapons. In 1961, for example, General Assembly resolution 1664 (XVI) recognized that “the countries not possessing nuclear weapons have a grave interest, and an important part to fulfil” in halting nuclear tests and achieving nuclear disarmament. General Assembly resolution 1653 (XVI) went further, noting that the targets of nuclear weapons would not just be “enemies” but “peoples of the world not involved in…war”, with devastation that would “exceed even the scope of war and cause indiscriminate suffering and destruction to mankind…contrary to the rules of international law and to the laws of humanity”. And finally, General Assembly resolution 1665 (XVI), unanimously adopted, called on nuclear and non-nuclear weapons possessors to “cooperate” to prevent further acquisition and spread of nuclear weapons. These early resolutions fed into “non-proliferation” talks between the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom, viewed as first steps towards disarmament.

4 0
3 years ago
The alignment of ancient Chinese cities toward the cardinal directions (north, south, east, west) best illustrates the importanc
Nonamiya [84]

Belief systems best illustrates the importance in the shaping of these early cities.

<u>Explanation:</u>

A belief system is an idea or collection of opinions that encourage us to understand our daily existence. This could be in the practice of faith, political association, philosophy, or devoutness, between many other items. These beliefs are molded and inspired by several distinct factors.

As is the case with languages, geographers have a way of dividing religions so people can quite grasp the geographic spread of belief systems.  One widely believed categorization that assists people to follow various belief systems considers what or whom people worship. Here belief system applies in the basis of aligning cities based on the directional beliefs.

3 0
3 years ago
Which terms best describe sales tax? Check all that apply.
Crazy boy [7]

The answer is <em>Sales Tax</em> can be described as Indirect and Regressive. It is indirect because the retribution that the consumer is going pay is collected by the seller, who acts as an intermediary between the people and the government and then is handed to the government (contrary to the direct type in which the taxation amount goes directly into the government's arks).

This type of system is also regressive because it doesn't change (increasing or decreasing) according to the payer's income. Instead, it puts a heavier contribution load on the people with lower incomes, and not on the rich and more wealthy part of the population.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In addition to Judeo-Christian principles, American government was influenced by principles first used in ancient Greece and in
blondinia [14]

Answer:

Rome

Explanation:

The American government is a government that has been formed on the principles of two religions and two ancient governments. The Judaism and the Christianity gave the primary principles for the formation of the American government, while the rest of the principles mostly came from the governments of ancient Greece (mostly Athens) and Rome. The combination of several different principles led to the extraction and combination of the best things of all four, thus creating a very good and rightful government. One of the very important traits of the American government is the bicameral system, something originating from ancient times, just adjusted for modern times, and this is a system that doesn't allow one political party to gain to much power and abuse it, thus protecting the interest of the people.

8 0
3 years ago
Which item is the best example of propaganda?
natka813 [3]

Answer:

I guess it's b but I'm thinking A

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Early urban civilizations all developed religions primarily to explain
    13·1 answer
  • What happened to more than 1,000 African Americans who were lynched in the south during the 1890s
    15·1 answer
  • James Locke argues that all humans are born with what natural rights?
    9·1 answer
  • This is the name given to the area in the northern portion of the Andes Mountains that is the most extensive area of high platea
    11·1 answer
  • What does mccutcheon say about religious studies method, orsi, courtright?
    7·1 answer
  • List three countries that did not belong to either alliance Someone please help please
    5·1 answer
  • What effect did President Reagan expect his economic policies to have on America?  A.  The national government would take in mor
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP EASY!!!!!!!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • How do you think more women can become involved in coaching professional sports? How can women overcome the barriers they curren
    10·2 answers
  • Name the apparatus labelled m
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!