Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

8

A wholly owned subsidiary is appropriate when the firm wants Multiple Choice 100 percent of the profits generated in a foreign m

arket. to share the cost and risk of developing a foreign market. to test a market. a plant that is ready to operate.

1 answer:

bezimeni [28]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

A wholly owned subsidiary is appropriate when the firm wants

100 percent of the profits generated in a foreign market.

Explanation:

100 percent ownership means 100 percent taking of the whole profits or losses generated by a company's subsidiary. It is only when a subsidiary is not wholly owned that the profits or losses generated by the subsidiary can be shared. When a company can afford it, they can take 100 percent ownership so that they can control the company wholly without any interference because ownership dictates control.

You might be interested in

Assess how Wal-Mart is managing ethics and social responsability as one of thé largest corporations in the world

timofeeve [1]

Answer:

Wal-Mart has taken revolutionary steps over the years to start econ friendly activities to promote ethics and social responsibility.

Explanation:

Wal-Mart began to take initiatives to address global impacts and embraced a sustainability program. It concentrated on redoing everything, and the main centre was to be Eco-friendly. There were original and inventive techniques received by the organisation, including building a solar panel to the stores. There was likewise establishment of innovations to use less fuel and electricity.

6 0

3 years ago

Clarence used to work as a doctor in a federal government hospital. After retiring, he started a private clinic to continue prac

Masteriza [31]

Answer:

self-actualization

Explanation:

The answer is deeply related to "Maslows Hierarchy of Needs."

Abraham Harold Maslow is a popular American psychologist who introduced a motivational theory consisting of five stages in relation to the<em> deficiency needs and growth needs of humans.</em>

Everything starts with the deficiency needs.<u> It is very important to satisfy this need in order to engage into the growth needs.</u> For example, a boy is very thirsty. If that need will not be met, the boy will continuously crave for water. On the contrary, if this is met immediately, the boy will aim to grow as a person. This is what you call the growth needs.

This needs are presented in a pyramid.

From top to bottom:

1. Self-actualization

2. Self-esteem Needs

3. Love or Belongingness Needs

4. Safety Needs

5. Physiological Needs

It is ideal for a person to progress from Physiological Needs to Self-actualization, but it doesn't mean every stage is always met. Sometimes, fluctuations occur depending on the situation.

Regarding Clarence's case above. It was stated that he already worked as a doctor in a federal government. This means that he has already satisfied his self-esteem needs and the other needs below. Becoming a doctor is a prestige and a feeling of accomplishment. This can be found on the <u>Self-Esteem Needs </u>stage. In addition to this, <em>Clarence already reached his full potential and is seeking for personal growth and independence. </em>This is backed by the statement above that he opened a private clinic to continue his practice. This means he is already on the self-actualization stage of the hierarchy.

6 0

3 years ago

If the domestic demand curve is Equal 20p Superscript negative 0.5, the domestic supply curve is Equal 5p Superscript 0.5, and

pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

$52

$ 1.33

consumer price will increase
consumer surplus will decrease
import will decrease
reduced export
portends gloom for the general outlook for the economy

Explanation:

Given domestic demand curve, S(p) = 20p⁻⁰°⁵

the domestic supply curve S(p)= 5p⁰°⁵

world price is $7.00

using calculus to determine the changes in consumer surplus

by consumer surplus means in this case supply exceeds demand

we establish the equilibrium point where the supply and demand functions meet or are equal

solving 20p⁻⁰°⁵ = 5p⁰°⁵

20/5 = p⁰°⁵/p⁻⁰°⁵

4 = p⁰°⁵⁺⁰°⁵

4= p = q which is the quantity produced

consumer surplus = maximum price willing to pay - Actual price

= ∫⁴₀ dp dp - p* q

= ∫⁴₀20p⁻⁰°⁵ dp- 7* 4

= 20∫⁴₀p⁻⁰°⁵ dp -28

= 20/0.5 p⁰°⁵- 28

= 40 *4⁰°⁵ - 28 = $52

producer surplus = it is a measure of producer welfare. It is measured as the difference between what producers are willing and able to supply a good for and the price they actually receive

thus producer surplus = p* q - ∫⁴₀ d(s) dp

= 7 * 4 - ∫⁴₀ 5p⁰°⁵ dp

= 28 - 5 ∫⁴₀ p⁰°⁵ dp

= 28 -5 *2/3 p¹°⁵

= 28 -5 *2/3 4¹°⁵

=$ 1.33

welfare from eliminating free trade

consumer price will increase
consumer surplus will decrease
import will decrease
reduced exports

portends gloom for the general outlook for the economy

5 0

3 years ago

Instructions: Please make sure that you show all your work when solving the problems. Feel free to make any assumptions whenever

My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Explanation:

From the given information:

The current price = $\dfrac{Dividend(D_o) \times (1+ Growth \ rate) }{\text{Cost of capital -Growth rate}}$

$15 = \dfrac{0.50 \times (1+ Growth rate)}{8\%-Growth rate}$

$15 \times (8 -Growth \ rate) = 0.50 +(0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$1.20 - (15 \times Growth \ rate) = 0.50 + (0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$0.70 = (15 \times growth \ rate) \\ \\ Growth \ rate = \dfrac{0.70}{15.50} \\ \\ Growth \ rate = 0.04516 \\ \\ Growth \ rate \simeq 4.52\% \\ \\$

2. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend \ payout \ ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%} \\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+0.04516)}{8\%-0.04516}$

=$75.526

Discount all potential future cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 +Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no\ of\ years} }$

$+ \dfrac{Terminal\ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years}} \Bigg)$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$75.526}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg )$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$75.526}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$ 54.1945

As a result, the analysts value the stock at $54.20, which is below their own estimates.

3. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend payout ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%}\\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763 \\ \\$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)\times dividend \ payout \ ratio}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+ 7 \%) \times 20\%}{8\%-7\%}$

=$53.8773

Discount all potential cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 + Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no \ of\ years} }+ \dfrac{Terminal \ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years }} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg( \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$53.8773}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg (\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$53.8773}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$39.460

As a result, the price is $39.460, and the other strategy would raise the value of the shareholders. Not this one, since paying a 100% dividend would result in a price of $54.20, which is higher than the current price.

Notice that the third question depicts the situation after 5 years, but the final decision will be the same since we are discounting in current terms. If compounding is used, the future value over 5 years is just the same as the first choice, which is the better option.

The presumption in the second portion is that after 5 years, the steady growth rate would be the same as measured in the first part (1).

8 0

3 years ago

An increase in the price of orange juice from $2.39/half gallon to $2.45/half gallon is accompanied by a 2.5 percent decrease in

Crank

<span>An increase in price could potentially result in a loss in sales due to the client base not believing that the price increase was justified.</span>

7 0

3 years ago