Answer:
Appropriate funds for social programs <u>SHARED POWER</u> ⇒ THERE ARE BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE SOCIAL PROGRAMS, AND EACH ONE GATHERS FUNDS FOR THEM
Construct a new highway <u>SHARED POWER</u> ⇒ BOTH STATES AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN BUILD HIGHWAYS
Redesign and print the hundred-dollar bill <u>FEDERAL POWER</u> ⇒ ONLY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN PRINT MONEY
Determine the requirements to receive a driver's license <u>STATE POWER</u> ⇒ STATE GOVERNMENTS DETERMINE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ISSUING DRIVING LICENCES, E.G. AGE
Raise taxes <u>SHARED POWERS</u> ⇒THERE ARE FEDERAL, STATE AND MUNICIPAL TAXES, AND EVERY GOVERNMENT LEVEL DETERMINES THEIR OWN TAX RATES.
Negotiate a trade agreement with the European Union <u>FEDERAL POWERS</u> ⇒ THE COMMERCE CLAUSE ESTABLISHES THAT ONLY CONGRESS CAN REGULATE INTERSTATE COMMERCE. THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH MAY NEGOTIATE A DEAL BUT CONGRESS MUST APPROVE IT.
Explanation:
Complete question:
Joe, a human resources specialist for Jersey Office Supplies Co., rides along with the furniture delivery people to observe the problems they were encountering and what activities they were required to perform. Joe was performing a:
A. personality test
B. performance appraisal
C. BARS
D. job analysis
Answer:
Joe was performing a job analysis
Explanation:
Job analyzes are a set of protocols for defining the contents for the job and the features or criteria required for the execution of the tasks. Job analytics provide employers with knowledge that helps to recognize which personnel is ideally suited to particular work.
An example of a job analysis model might list tasks or activities of the job and determine each performance level. Within this way, the role of job analysis is critical. Many companies typically take the same generic approach without details on the task description. All workers are tested in a similar set of features or characteristics presuming that they are required for all work.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The concept of "Nash equilibrium" is been by economist and also by "gamers" in game theory. Nash equilibrium is so good for making decisions and the determination of strategies.
In playing this game, the players or participants can use the pure strategy or the mixed strategy. The mixed strategy is the use of different strategies randomly.
"If a player chooses a mixed strategy in a Nash equilibrium, this implies that the payoff from using that mixed strategy is the same as the payoff from using any of the pure strategies in it".
The statement given above is FALSE because the PAYOFF WILL INCREASE IF WE ARE TO PLAY A MIXED STRATEGY.
For instance if we have a head of 1 and -1, and a tail of -1 and 1, the payoff for pure strategy is likely one or minus one but for a mixed strategy it could be zero.
Answer: c) economies of scale; increase
Explanation:
When industries are limited by the size of the domestic market, opening trade to the world markets will likely lead to economies of scale and increase real GDP per capita in the domestic country.
When this industry choose to break out of this limitation placed on them due to the small size of market in their country, the idea of opening trade to the world market would lead to reduction in production costs since they now have a larger market (and thus produce more). Also, the real GDP per capita in the domestic country should increase since the company in this domestic nation has expanded its production to the world market.
NOTE:
Economies of scale occur when the cost of production is now reduced because there is an increase in a company's production.
Answer:
yeah sure what do you want to ch.At about
Explanation:
because i don't really care what we talk abt
