HAHAHAHAHAAHHAAH ITS NAKEDCHICKEN
D probably Australian aboriginals were not exposed to these viruses and their body couldn’t fight it off
that statement is false
after both sides rest their cases, both the defendant's attorney and the plaintiff's attorney would each give a closing statement. They would most likely use this opportunity to appeal to both logic and emotion of the juries in order to gain support for the voting.
The steps of the research cycle in the correct order is given as:
⇒ Deductive approach/above theory
⇒ hypothesis
⇒ empirical observation/inductive approach below
⇒ Analysis.
<h3>What is the research cycle?</h3>
The research cycle is a set of steps that guide us through the process of gathering data and generating conclusions.
<h3>What is the research cycle's purpose?</h3>
Its primary goal is to generalize results. Qualitative research designs, on the other hand, are used to comprehend experiences and viewpoints using non-numerical data such as words and text.
<h3>What is the most important stage of the research cycle?</h3>
The first stage in doing research is to define the scientific problem. To minimize misinterpretation later, it is critical to precisely express your concern.
The formulation of scientific problems is often acknowledged as the most challenging and significant aspect of any research activity.
Learn more about the research cycle:
brainly.com/question/25257437
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
