Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
<u>Cost center responsibility</u> reports typically focus on the flexible budget variance, which is the difference between actual results and the flexible budget.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The cost center is the responsible center where the manager is only responsible for controlling costs. It is his duty to track the expenses. The performance evaluation of the cost center is based on its flexible budget variance.
The flexible budget variance generally provides the difference between actual results and the flexible budget. The cost center is of two types:
i) Production cost center
ii) Service cost center
The production department, maintenance department, accounting department and human resource department together form the cost center.
I know preliminary court is basically seeing if it's worth going further in Criminal charges ( if it is a reasonable case) then you'll have grand jury trial in which a jury will decide if there's enough evidence to indict someone (if they feel the person is really guilty) and then you have criminal court when another judge and jury decide if the person is surely guilty or not and then the person can go free or be sentenced.
Answer:
neuroticism
Explanation:
Neuroticism: In psychology, the term neuroticism is defined as one of the personality traits in the theory Big-Five personality traits which include a total of five different dimensions of personality traits.
An individual who is experiencing neuroticism tends to be moody more than the average people and therefore experiences feelings like worry, frustration, anxiety, depressed mood, jealousy, loneliness, etc.
In the question above, the given statement signifies neuroticism.
