Explanation:
The SMART in SMART goals stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound. Defining these parameters as they pertain to your goal helps ensure that your objectives are attainable within a certain time frame.
Answer:
Confucianism teaches how to act toward others; Daoism teaches how to act toward oneself and nature.
Explanation:
Confucianism and Daoism are two of the most popular philosophies or ideologies that are followed even today, not only by the number of followers native to Asia, but also by many other people around the world.
While they have some religious elements in common, the two philosophies seem to contradict each other at first sight. However, seeing it differently, between these two ideologies, methodologies of human thought seem to be intertwined with respect to everything; which leads to certain defined codes of conduct.
In spite of everything, the two philosophies differ in some things. Above all, Confucianism is more earthly. As such, it focuses on the social aspect of man and his daily life. As Confucius said, philosophy is inherently the social creature that has the ability to be good. You become someone superior if you behave in the way society expects to keep in harmony.
Daoism is different, because it goes beyond this world. The main idea of this philosophy is to embrace the Dao (the greatest reality that is composed of the universe and everything else). It also focuses on the person's relationship with himself to achieve inner harmony. Therefore, it is well to say that in Confucianism the person achieves self-improvement by relating to his immediate external environment, while Daoism proposes that this overcoming is achieved from oneself; that is, internally.
Answer:
In simple words, The Federalists presumed that this amendment was not appropriate since they thought that, as it stands, the Legislature restricted only the legislature, not the citizens. The Anti-Federalists argued that the Charter granted so much authority to the national government, and the population would be at threat of tyranny without a Bill of Rights.
