Edmund Gwenn
I need 20 characters to answer the question lol
Answer:
B. States must provide minors accused of crimes with most of the same "due process" rights given to adults.
Explanation:
The passage below is from the U.S. Supreme Court decision In re Gault (1967). From the inception of the juvenile court system, wide differences have been tolerated... between the procedural rights accorded to adults and those of juveniles. In practically all jurisdictions, there are rights granted to adults, which are withheld from juveniles.. [H]istory has again demonstrated that unbridled discretion, however benevolently motivated, is frequently a poor substitute for principle and procedure... Which conclusion did the Court draw from this reasoning?
In re Gault was a case where parents believed their child was denied due process. The court ruled that states must reform their procedures of juvenile justice in order words,States must provide minors accused of crimes with most of the same "due process" rights given to adults.
They changed because now they have a total vision of what a group can improve, and understand that they should not focus only on one area so that practice and better possibilities can happen, they focus on the whole.
Similar aspects to those of before are the aspects that are still an agenda such as the discussion of morality and things that were still portrayed earlier.
The more people it had the more it votes it attained
