This example illustrates the foot-in-the-door technique.
This refers to the fact that if you manage to convince somebody to do a small favor for you, they will be more likely to help you with something more engaging and important as well. As you can see here, Maria helped Nat with one lesson, but then she was more willing to help him with three.
Shock, explosions, electrocution
Answer:
b. the marginal social benefit to exceed the marginal private cost of the last unit produced.
Explanation:
<u>Positive Externality-</u>
Positive Externality occurs when production or the consumption or of the good causes benefit to the third party.
For example, when the individual consume education in order to be uplifted and get a benefit but this education also benefits the society by uplifting the whole society.
<u>Positive externality causes the marginal social benefit to be greater than the marginal private benefit.</u>
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
