Answer:
consequential damages
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bill can recover the 900 he lost from Carl as consequential damages. These are damages have happened because of one party's failure to meet a certain deadline or contractual obligation and can be proven in court. Therefore since Bill can prove that he lost the 900 because of Carl's negligence he will most likely win that case.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
$22,789
Explanation:
One of the uses of the Bank Reconciliation Statement is to check the accuracy of the Cash Balance.
The Balance on the Bank Statement and that of the Cash Book in the Ledgers should always agree.
Bank Reconciliation Statement as a July 31
Balance as per Bank Statement $22,364
Add Lodgments not yet credited $1,745
Less unpresented checks ($1,320)
Balance as per Cash Book $22,789
Therefore,
The balance of cash using a bank reconciliation is $22,789
<span>The natural rate of employment would decline, because people would have better chances at finding a way of employment. This would help cut costs in government aid and help people feel more self-sufficient and secure in taking care of their families.</span>
Answer:
The Required Return is 10.82%.
Explanation:
The Dividends Model for the Constant Growth is given below:
P0 = D1 / (Ke - g)
Arranging the above equation for "Ke", that is the Required Return:
⇒ Ke = (D1 / P0) + g
Putting Values and we get:
Required Return = Ke = (2.34 / 37) + .045 = .1082 = 10.82%.
Thanks!
Answer:
a. increases the real interest rate, which reduces private investment spending.
b. is not a major concern, because the Fed will likely lower the real interest rate when actual output is far below potential.
Explanation:
Increase in government spending means that the government would probably have to borrow money from the credit market. Because the government is so large, it will borrow in large amounts which would force rates to rise. At these higher rates, the private sector might find it too expensive to borrow money and so would be crowed out such that they reduce their investment spending.
When the economy is facing an output that is lower than potential, the Fed will engage in monetary policy aimed at reducing interest rates to improve investment spending. This therefore negates the effect of crowing out which means that it would no longer be a major concern.