DeMarcus says the number 24 / 6 belongs only to the set of rational number explain his error

Last week Julia ran 30 miles more than Pranav.Julia ran 47 miles.How many miles did Pranav run?

andrew-mc [135]

17 miles as it is 47-30

8 0

3 years ago

The mayor of a town has proposed a plan for the annexation of a new bridge. A political study took a sample of 1000 voters in th

garri49 [273]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.42 -0.39}{\sqrt{\frac{0.39(1-0.39)}{1000}}}=1.945$

$p_v =P(Z>1.945)=0.0259$

If we compare the p value obtained with the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of residents who favored annexation is not significantly higher than 0.39.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=1000 represent the random sample taken

$\hat p=0.42$ estimated proportion of residents who favored annexation

$p_o=0.39$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.02$ represent the significance level

Confidence=98% or 0.98

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the proportion is higher than 0.39:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.39$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.39$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

3) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.42 -0.39}{\sqrt{\frac{0.39(1-0.39)}{1000}}}=1.945$

4) Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.02$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>1.945)=0.0259$

If we compare the p value obtained with the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of residents who favored annexation is not significantly higher than 0.39.

4 0

3 years ago

Helpppppppppppppppppppppp

castortr0y [4]

Answer: second option y = 2(x + 7/2)^2 + 1/2

Explanation:

1) given:

y = (x + 3)^2 + (x + 4)^2

2) expand the binomials:

y = x^2 + 6x + 9 + x^2 + 8x + 16

3) add like terms:

y = 2x^2 + 14x + 25

4) take common factor 2 of the first two terms:

y = 2 (x^2 + 7x) + 25

5) complete squares for x^2 + 7x

x^2 + 7x = [x +(7/2)x ]^2 - 49/4

6) substitue x^2 + 7x = (x + 7/2)^2 - 49/4 in the equation for y:

y = 2 [ (x + 7/2)^2 - 49/4] + 25

7) take -49/4 out of the square brackets.

y = 2 (x + 7/2)^2 - 49/2 + 25

8) add like terms:

y = 2(x + 7/2)^2 + 1/2

And that is the vertex for of the given expression.

7 0

3 years ago

Bob is having a cookout. He bought 6 gallons of seltzer water. How many full 1-pint servings of seltzer can he pour?

sergejj [24]

Answer:

48 pints

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I will give brainliest for right answer

Nastasia [14]