Answer:
Computer ethics is a part of practical philosophy concerned with how computing professionals should make decisions regarding professional and social conduct.
Hope you like the answer.
Answer:
$27,600
Explanation:
Divisional segment margin $132,000
Less common fixed costs
not traceable to the individual divisions
($104,400)
Net operating income $27,600
$92,200+$39,800 = $132,000
The company's net operating income is $27,600
Answer:
C. Buddy cannot be a creditor of the corporation after the redemption.
Explanation:
"A stock redemption that terminates a shareholder’s entire stock ownership in a corporation will qualify for sale or exchange treatment under § 302(b)(3). The attribution rules generally apply in determining whether the shareholder’s stock ownership has been completely terminated. However, the family attribution rules do not apply to a complete termination redemption if the following conditions are met:
The former shareholder has no interest, other than that of a creditor, in the corporation for at least 10 years after the redemption (including an interest as an officer, director, or employee).
The former shareholder files an agreement to notify the IRS of any prohibited interest acquired within the 10-year period and to retain all necessary records pertaining to the redemption during this time period."
Reference: South-Western, Thomson. “Chapter 5.” To Qualify for Sale or Exchange Treatment, a Stock Redemption Generally Must Result in a Substantial Reduction in a Shareholde, 2005,
Answer:
exist 139,200
Explanation:
Assume that Pell allocates manufacturing overhead based on machine hours, estimated 10,000 machine hours and exist 87,000 that implies that the standard cost per machine hour = exist 87,000 / 10,000 = 8.7 exist
Therefore the manufacturing overhead costs if Pell actually used 16,000 machine hours will be: 16000 x 8.7 = exist 139,200
Answer:
new capital adds more to production in a country that doesn't have much capital than in a country that already has much capital
Explanation:
- The catch-up effect is explained by the convergence principle that the rate of growth in the per capita income of poor economies is higher than the rate of growth of the per capita income of rich economies, which ultimately leads to the end of the two economies.
- This theory is supported by the law of low returns because diminished returns are stronger in capital-intensive countries than in capital countries, which cannot be classified as capital-intensive to develop.
- The growth rate of emerging economies is higher than that of developed economies. In addition, the costs of research and development of emerging economies are low because they can simulate technology and processes from developed economies. all economies will transform into a global culture.