1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhuklara [117]
3 years ago
5

Sales volume plays a large role in determining per unit costs in the cost-plus pricing approach.

Business
1 answer:
gulaghasi [49]3 years ago
5 0
That statement is true.
In the cost-plus pricing approach,  you add up all the cost needed for the product (material, direct labor, and overhead) and then calculate it with mark-up percentage in order to determine the price that you should set for your product.
Since cost per unit is determined by total products/total cost, sales volume played <span>a large role in determining per unit costs</span>
You might be interested in
Business sofware programs make it possible to
Leto [7]

Answer:

increase productivity in office setting

4 0
3 years ago
Hair Zone manufactures a brand of hair styling gel. It is considering adding a modified version of the product-a foam that provi
polet [3.4K]

Answer:

Should Hair Zone add the new product to its line? Why or why not?

  • Yes they should, since it would increase their total net income by $210,000.

Explanation:

                                       Current hair gel         New foam product

Unit selling price                  $2.00                          $2.25

Unit variable costs               $0.85                           $1.25

expected sales for new foam product 1,000,000 units, but 600,000 units would replace sales from current hair gel

expected sales for current hair gel if new foam is introduced 900,000 units (1,500,000 if no new product is introduced)

                                         Alternative 1        Alternative 2        Differential

                                         no new foam       new foam             income

total sales revenue          $3,000,000        $4,050,000         $1,050,000

total variable costs          ($1,275,000)        ($2,015,000)        ($740,000)

additional fixed costs                      $0           ($100,000)        ($100,000)

total                                   $1,725,000         $1,935,000           $210,000

5 0
3 years ago
Pls help me!! i need help with an essay for business
vodomira [7]
Do u also want some sources?
4 0
3 years ago
The inventory of Cullumber Company was destroyed by fire on March 1. From an examination of the accounting records, the followin
maria [59]

Answer:

a. Merchandise lost by fire value  = $20,760

b. Merchandise lost by fire value  = $25,770

Explanation:

Net sales = $51,000 - $1,100

= $49,900

Net purchase cost = $31,000 + 1,200 - $1,500

= $30,700

a. Gross profit = $49,900 × 40%

= $19,960

Cost of goods sold = $49,900 - $19,960

= $29,940

Cost of goods sold = beginning inventory + Purchases - ending inventory

= $29,940 = $20,000 + $30,700 -  ending inventory

Ending inventory = $20,760

Merchandise lost by fire value  = $20,760

b. Gross profit = $49,900 × 30%

= $14,970

Cost of goods sold = $49,900 - $14,970

= $34,930

Cost of goods sold = beginning inventory + Purchases - ending inventory

= $34,930 = $30,000 + $30,700 - ending inventory

ending inventory = $25,770

Merchandise lost by fire value  = $25,770

5 0
3 years ago
Master Hatter's demand for hats is 25,000 per year. The order cost is $425 and the carrying cost is $4.50 per unit. The cost pai
laiz [17]

Answer with its Explanation:

<u>Part A.</u> Economic order quantity Computation

Economic order quantity can be calculated by using the following formula:

EOQ = Squaroot of (2* D * S / H)

Here

Ordering cost per order is $425 which is S

Annual Holding cost per unit per year is $4.5 which is H

Annual Demand is 25000 Units

By putting values, we have:

EOQ = (2 * 25000 * $425 / $4.5) ^(1 / 2) = 2173 Hats

<u></u>

<u>Part B.</u>

Total Cost at EOQ = Purchasing Cost + Total Ordering cost + Holding Cost

By putting values, we have:

Total Cost = 25,000 Units * $25 per unit + ($25,000 / 2173 Hats) * $425 + (2173 Hats / 2) * $4.5 = $634,778 Annual Cost

<u>Part C.</u>

For ordering at-least 2000 units per order, the total cost would be:

Total Cost under 2000 order quantity = 25,000 * $25 per unit   + (25000/2000) * $425 + (2000/2) * $4.5

Total Cost under 2000 order quantity = $634,813

By ordering at least 2000 hats will bring a loss of $35 ($634,778 - $634,813), hence Master Hatter must only order in EOQ.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following best summarizes the critical skills in real estate brokerage?A. Communications, market knowledge, mathema
    15·1 answer
  • Please assist with the answer
    8·1 answer
  • When the fed sells bonds to financial institutions, new money moves directly:?
    8·1 answer
  • The range rule of thumb roughly estimates the standard deviation of a data set as​ _______.
    11·1 answer
  • LO 2.1Which of the following is the primary source of revenue for a service business?
    5·2 answers
  • Discuss how a minor change in demand at the retail level can significantly impact supply chain variation at distributors, manufa
    14·1 answer
  • Divide the following by short division:<br> 3) 186
    5·1 answer
  • You purchased a share of stock for $53. One year later you received $3.00 as dividend and sold the share for $52. Your holding-p
    15·1 answer
  • Explain why making the minimum payment leads to paying the most interest.
    10·1 answer
  • Marginal resource cost is: A) Determined by the marginal physical product schedule for an input B) A firm's cost of hiring one g
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!