An online classroom allows you to do it without physically being there
In team-based environments, the principal may have difficulty determining individual contributions by members. This can create a situation in which an opportunistic employee does little work but takes credit and this is known as adverse selection.
<h3>
What is Adverse selection?</h3>
- In general, the term "adverse selection" refers to a situation in which sellers have knowledge about a certain feature of product quality but purchasers do not, or vice versa. In other words, it is an instance of the use of asymmetric information.
- When one side to a transaction has more in-depth knowledge of the relevant facts than the other, this is known as asymmetric information, also known as information failure.
- Usually, the vendor is the one who has more knowledge. When both parties are knowledgeable, it is said that there is symmetric information.
To learn more about business site, refer:
brainly.com/question/28085653
#SPJ4
Answer:
Dealer Market
Explanation:
In a dealer market, multiple dealers give out their various prices on the sales and purchases of their specific and particular security of instrument. It is a financial tool for dealers in the market. The dealer market becomes more efficient for financial securities because it provides superior mechanism which should be protected.
It enables buyers and sellers to buy and sell independently through the market makers, known as dealers.
Foreign exchange and bonds are found in the dealer market.
In the secondary market, securities are traded by investors while in the primary market, they are created.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
